Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375098›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Exploring individual and work organizational peculiarities of working in emergency medical communication centers in Norway- a qualitative study.

Ann-Chatrin Leonardsen, Helge Ramsdal, Theresa M Olasveengen, Jon E Steen-Hansen, Fredrik Westmark, Andreas E Hansen, Camilla Hardeland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The competency requirements for emergency medical services call takers and dispatchers - a scoping review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ann-Chatrin LeonardsenDepartment of Health and Welfare, Ostfold University College, Postal box code (PB) 700, NO-1757, Halden, Norway. ann.c.leonardsen@hiof.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5608-9401
Helge RamsdalDepartment of Health and Social Studies, Ostfold University College, PB 700, NO-1757, Halden, Norway.
Theresa M OlasveengenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, PB 4956, NO-0424, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Jon E Steen-HansenVestfold Hospital Trust, Prehospital Clinic, PB 2168, NO-3103, Tønsberg, Norway.
Fredrik WestmarkOstfold HF Hospital Trust, Prehospital Clinic, PB 300, NO-1714, Sarpsborg, Norway.
Andreas E HansenPrehospital clinic, Oslo University Hospital, PB 4956, NO-0424, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla HardelandDepartment of Health and Social Studies, Ostfold University College, PB 700, NO-1757, Halden, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Medical call-takers working in Emergency Medical Communication Centers (EMCCs) are addressing complex and potentially life threatening problems. The call-takers have to make fast decisions, responding to problems described in phone calls. Recent studies focus mainly on individual aspects of call-takers' work. The objectives of this study were to explore 1) What characterizes individual work performance of call takers in EMCCs? and 2) What characterizes work organizational factors call takers see as most relevant to the performance of their work?

methodsThe research is based upon in-depth interviews with call takers at three EMCCs in Norway (n = 19). Interviews were performed during the period May 2013 to September 2014. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsTwo main themes that related to individual work performance and to work organizational factors in EMCCs were identified, namely: 1) "Core technologies" and 2) "Environmental issues" . The theme "Core technologies" included the subthemes a) multiple tasks, b) critical incidents, and c) unpredictability. The theme "Environmental issues" included the subthemes a) lack of support, b) lack of resources, c) exposure to complaints, and d) an invisible service.

conclusionAt the individual level, multiple tasks, how to cope with critical incidents, and the unpredictability of daily work when calls are received, make the work of call takers both stressful and challenging. The individual call taker's ability to interprete the situation by intuition and experience when calls are received, is the main factor behind the peculiarities working in the centers at the individual level. At the organizational level, the lack of resources and managerial support seems to provoke concerns about the quality of services rendered by the centers. These aspects should be taken into account in the managing of these services, making them a more integrated part of the health service system.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleNorwayQualitative Research1-1-3-calls9-1-1- callsCall takerCore technologiesDecision makingEmergency medical communication centersEmergency medical dispatchEmergency medical dispatcherManagementSituation awareness

Identifiers

PMID31375098
PMCPMC6679546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.