Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375073›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2019

Pregnancy as a risk factor for severe influenza infection: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Dominik Mertz, Calvin Ka-Fung Lo, Lyubov Lytvyn, Justin R Ortiz, Mark Loeb, FLURISK-INVESTIGATORS

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Influenza.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominik MertzDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Calvin Ka-Fung LoDepartments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, MDCL 3203, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
Lyubov LytvynDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Justin R OrtizInitiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mark LoebDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. loebm@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-5390
FLURISK-INVESTIGATORS

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWHO identifies pregnant women to be at increased risk for severe outcomes from influenza virus infections and recommends that they be prioritized for influenza vaccination. The evidence supporting this, however, is inconsistent. Ecologic studies in particular suggest more severe outcomes from influenza infection during pregnancy than studies based on individual patient data. Individual studies however may be underpowered and, as reported in a previous systematic review, confounding factors could not be adjusted for. We therefore conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to assess the risk for severe outcomes of influenza infection in pregnant women while adjusting for other prognostic factors.

methodsWe contacted authors of studies included in a recently published systematic review. We pooled the individual participant data of women of reproductive age and laboratory confirmation of influenza virus infection. We used a generalized linear mixed model and reported odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsA total of 33 datasets with data on 186,656 individuals were available, including 36,498 eligible women of reproductive age and known pregnancy status. In the multivariable model, pregnancy was associated with a 7 times higher risk of hospital admission (OR 6.80, 95%CI 6.02-7.68), among patients receiving medical care as in- or outpatients, pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of admission to intensive care units (ICU; OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.48-0.69), and was not significantly associated with death (OR 1.00, 95%CI 0.75-1.34).

conclusionsOur study found a higher risk of influenza associated hospitalization among pregnant women as compared to non-pregnant women. We did not find a higher mortality rate or higher likelihood of ICU admission among pregnant women who sought medical care. However, this study did not address whether a true community based cohort of pregnant women is at higher risk of influenza associated complications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnant PeopleRisk FactorsInfluenza VaccinesInfluenzaMeta-analysisPregnancySeverityVaccine

Identifiers

PMID31375073
PMCPMC6679491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.