Trial reportIEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]2019
Ankle Mechanical Impedance During Waling in Chronic Stroke: Preliminary Results.
Trial report in IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization and clinical implications of ankle impedance during walking in chronic stroke.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- How Does Ankle Mechanical Stiffness Change as a Function of Muscle Activation in Standing and During the Late Stance of Walking?IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- How Well Do Commonly Used Co-contraction Indices Approximate Lower Limb Joint Stiffness Trends During Gait for Individuals Post-stroke?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic joint mechanics, collectively known as mechanical impedance, are often altered following upper motoneuron disease, which can hinder mobility for these individuals. Typically, assessments of altered limb mechanics are obtained while the patient is at rest, which differs from the dynamic conditions of mobility. The purpose of this study was to quantify ankle impedance during walking in individuals post-stroke, determine differences from the healthy population, and assess the relationship between impedance impairment and clinical outcome measures. Preliminary data were collected in four individuals post-stroke. Displacement perturbations were applied to the ankle during stance phase, and least-squares system identification was performed to estimate ankle impedance. In comparison to the healthy population, the paretic ankle showed reduced variation of stiffness during mid-stance of walking, and damping estimates during early and mid-stance were increased. Clinical measures obtained during dynamic tasks showed strong correlation with changes to the stiffness component of impedance, while clinical measures obtained passively were not correlated to stiffness. Impairment in ankle damping was not correlated with any of the measures tested. This work provides novel, preliminary insight into paretic ankle impedance during walking, differences from healthy data, and elucidates how current clinical metrics correspond to the true values of ankle stiffness and damping during gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.