ArticleProteins2019
Assessment of protein assembly prediction in CASP13.
Article in Proteins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reciprocal best matching: a new pipeline for scoring models with unknown stoichiometry in CASP experiments.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A fully automated benchmarking suite to compare macromolecular complexes.Nature methods · 2026Review
- CASP16 Protein Monomer Structure Prediction Assessment.Proteins · 2026Article
- Article
- CAPRI-Q: The CAPRI resource evaluating the quality of predicted structures of protein complexes.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Article
- CASP15 cryo-EM protein and RNA targets: Refinement and analysis using experimental maps.Proteins · 2023Article
- The impact of AI-based modeling on the accuracy of protein assembly prediction: Insights from CASP15.Proteins · 2023Article
- Enhancing alphafold-multimer-based protein complex structure prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The Impact of AI-Based Modeling on the Accuracy of Protein Assembly Prediction: Insights from CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Enhancing AlphaFold-Multimer-based Protein Complex Structure Prediction with MULTICOM in CASP15.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The protein common assembly database (ProtCAD)-a comprehensive structural resource of protein complexes.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- The Possible Mechanism of Amyloid Transformation Based on the Geometrical Parameters of Early-Stage Intermediate in Silico Model for Protein Folding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Modeling the Dynamics of Protein-Protein Interfaces, How and Why?Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Building Structural Models of a Whole Mycoplasma Cell.Journal of molecular biology · 2022Article
- Modeling SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the CASP-commons experiment.Proteins · 2021Article
- Modeling of protein complexes in CASP14 with emphasis on the interaction interface prediction.Proteins · 2021Article
- Article
- Assessment of the CASP14 assembly predictions.Proteins · 2021Article
- Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO)-Perspectives on the future of fully automated evaluation of structure prediction methods.Proteins · 2021Article
- Assessment of domain interactions in the fourteenth round of the Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP14).Proteins · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present the assembly category assessment in the 13th edition of the CASP community-wide experiment. For the second time, protein assemblies constitute an independent assessment category. Compared to the last edition we see a clear uptake in participation, more oligomeric targets released, and consistent, albeit modest, improvement of the predictions quality. Looking at the tertiary structure predictions, we observe that ignoring the oligomeric state of the targets hinders modeling success. We also note that some contact prediction groups successfully predicted homomeric interfacial contacts, though it appears that these predictions were not used for assembly modeling. Homology modeling with sizeable human intervention appears to form the basis of the assembly prediction techniques in this round of CASP. Future developments should see more integrated approaches where subunits are modeled in the context of the assemblies they form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.