ArticlePloS one2019
Unraveling the structural landscape of intra-chain domain interfaces: Implication in the evolution of domain-domain interactions.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting protein-protein interactions in the human proteome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Structural motifs in protein cores and at protein-protein interfaces are different.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intra-chain domain interactions are known to play a significant role in the function and stability of multidomain proteins. These interactions are mediated through a physical interaction at domain-domain interfaces (DDIs). With a motivation to understand evolution of interfaces, we have investigated similarities among DDIs. Even though interfaces of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) have been previously studied by structurally aligning interfaces, similar analyses have not yet been performed on DDIs of either multidomain proteins or PPIs. For studying the structural landscape of DDIs, we have used iAlign to structurally align intra-chain domain interfaces of domains. The interface alignment of spatially constrained domains (due to inter-domain linkers) showed that ~88% of these could identify a structural matching interface having similar C-alpha geometry and contact pattern despite that aligned domain pairs are not structurally related. Moreover, the mean interface similarity score (IS-score) is 0.307, which is higher compared to the average random IS-score (0.207) suggesting domain interfaces are not random. The structural space of DDIs is highly connected as ~84% of all possible directed edges among interfaces are found to have at most path length of 8 when 0.26 is IS-score threshold. At this threshold, ~83% of interfaces form the largest strongly connected component. Thus, suggesting that structural space of intra-chain domain interfaces is degenerate and highly connected, as has been found in PPI interfaces. Interestingly, searching for structural neighbors of inter-chain interfaces among intra-chain interfaces showed that ~86% could find a statistically significant match to intra-chain interface with a mean IS-score of 0.311. This implies that domain interfaces are degenerate whether formed within a protein or between proteins. The interface degeneracy is most likely due to limited possible ways of packing secondary structures. In principle, interface similarities can be exploited to accurately model domain interfaces in structure prediction of multidomain proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.