ReviewExpert review of vaccines2019
The development of inovirus-associated vector vaccines using phage-display technologies.
Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetically engineered bacteriophages as novel nanomaterials: applications beyond antimicrobial agents.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Epitopes and Mimotopes Identification Using Phage Display for Vaccine Development against Infectious Pathogens.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Article
- PLGA microparticle formulations for tunable delivery of a nano-engineered filamentous bacteriophage-based vaccine: in vitro and in silico-supported approach.Journal of nanostructure in chemistry · 2023Article
- A New Vaccination Method Based on Phage NgoΦ6 and Its Phagemid Derivatives.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Bacteriophages as Potential Tools for Use in Antimicrobial Therapy and Vaccine Development.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Phages in vaccine design and immunity; mechanisms and mysteries.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.