Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31373822›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2019

Analysis of Density Functional Tight Binding with Natural Bonding Orbitals.

Xiya Lu, Juan Duchimaza-Heredia, Qiang Cui

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiya LuDepartment of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute , University of Wisconsin-Madison , 1101 University Avenue , Madison , Wisconsin 53706 , United States.
Juan Duchimaza-Heredia
Boston University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Development and application of QM/MM methods for metalloenzymesR01GM106443 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CUI, QIANG · 2013 to 2020
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The description of chemical bonding by the density functional tight binding (DFTB) model is analyzed using natural bonding orbitals (NBOs) and compared to results from density functional theory (B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ) calculations. Several molecular systems have been chosen to represent fairly diverse bonding scenarios that include standard covalent bonds, hypervalent interactions, multicenter bonds, metal-ligand interactions (with and without the pseudo-Jahn-Teller effect), and through-space donor-acceptor interactions. Overall, the results suggest that DFTB3/3OB provides physically sound descriptions for the different bonding scenarios analyzed here, as reflected by the general agreement between DFTB3 and B3LYP NBO properties, such as the nature of the NBOs, the magnitudes of natural charges and bond orders, and the dominant donor-acceptor interactions. The degree of ligand-to-metal charge transfer and the ionic nature of pentavalent phosphate are overestimated, likely reflecting the minimal-basis nature of DFTB3/3OB. Moreover, certain orbital interactions, such as geminal interactions, are observed to be grossly overestimated by DFTB3 for hypervalent phosphate and several transition metal compounds that involve copper and nickel. The study indicates that results from NBO analysis can be instructive for identifying electronic structure descriptions at the approximate quantum-mechanical level that require improvement and thus for guiding the systematic improvement of these methods.

Identifiers

PMID31373822
PMCPMC7289594
OpenAlexW2966516140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.