ArticleJournal of animal science2019
Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling breeding programs considering social behavior in large groups of farmed fish.Heredity · 2026Article
- Towards assessing indirect genetic effects in dairy cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Genetic parameters and potential of reducing tail and ear damage in pigs through breeding.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Cognitive and non-cognitive factors predict pigs' positions in an aggression social network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Classification of resilience to weaning stress using cortisol patterns and associations with growth and behavior in Yorkshire gilts.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Effects of Herd Establishment Time and Structure on Group-on-Individual Aggression Intensity in Farm Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Social Genetic Effects on Average Daily Gain in Purebreds and Crossbreds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genetic Analysis of Novel Behaviour Traits in Pigs Derived from Social Network Analysis.Genes · 2022Article
- The Social Life of Pigs: Changes in Affiliative and Agonistic Behaviors following Mixing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Feeding behavior in pigs.Journal of animal science · 2021Article
- How to Improve Meat Quality and Welfare in Entire Male Pigs by Genetics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Phenomes: the current frontier in animal breeding.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Review
- The predictive ability of indirect genetic models is reduced when culled animals are omitted from the data.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Large-Scale Phenotyping of Livestock Welfare in Commercial Production Systems: A New Frontier in Animal Breeding.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mixing of pigs into new social groups commonly induces aggressive interactions that result in skin lesions on the body of the animals. The relationship between skin lesions and aggressive behavioral interactions in group-housed pigs can be analyzed within the framework of social genetic effects (SGE). This study incorporates the quantification of aggressive interactions between pairs of animals in the modeling of SGE for skin lesions in different regions of the body in growing pigs. The dataset included 792 pigs housed in 59 pens. Skin lesions in the anterior, central, and caudal regions of the body were counted 24 h after pig mixing. Animals were video-recorded for 9 h postmixing and trained observers recorded the type and duration of aggressive interactions between pairs of animals. The number of seconds that pairs of pigs spent engaged in reciprocal fights and unilateral attack behaviors were used to parametrize the intensity of social interactions (ISI). Three types of models were fitted: direct genetic additive model (DGE), traditional social genetic effect model (TSGE) assuming uniform interactions between dyads, and an intensity-based social genetic effect model (ISGE) that used ISI to parameterize SGE. All models included fixed effects of sex, replicate, lesion scorer, weight at mixing, premixing lesion count, and the total time that the animal spent engaged in aggressive interactions (reciprocal fights and unilateral attack behaviors) as a covariate; a random effect of pen; and a random direct genetic effect. The ISGE models recovered more direct genetic variance than DGE and TSGE, and the estimated heritabilities (h^D2) were highest for all traits (P < 0.01) for the ISGE with ISI parametrized with unilateral attack behavior. The TSGE produced estimates that did not differ significantly from DGE (P > 0.5). Incorporating the ISI into ISGE, even in a small dataset, allowed separate estimation of the genetic parameters for direct and SGE, as well as the genetic correlation between direct and SGE (r^ds), which was positive for all lesion traits. The estimates from ISGE suggest that if behavioral observations are available, selection incorporating SGE may reduce the consequences of aggressive behaviors after mixing pigs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.