Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31373606›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

Predicting the effects of SNPs on transcription factor binding affinity.

Sierra S Nishizaki, Natalie Ng, Shengcheng Dong, Robert S Porter, Cody Morterud, Colten Williams, Courtney Asman, Jessica A Switzenberg, Alan P Boyle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Computational exploration ofBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Applications for Deep Learning in Epilepsy Genetic Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sierra S NishizakiDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Natalie NgDepartment of Human Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Shengcheng DongDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Robert S PorterDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Cody MorterudDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Colten WilliamsDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Courtney AsmanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jessica A SwitzenbergDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Alan P BoyleDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

Funding

University of Michigan Training Program in Genomic ScienceT32HG000040 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Sebastian Zoellner · 1995 to 2026
$16.4M
Resource Informatics and ProductionU41HG009293 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOYLE, ALAN P, CHERRY, J. MICHAEL · 2017 to 2019
$2.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000040NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG009293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationGenome-wide association studies have revealed that 88% of disease-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reside in noncoding regions. However, noncoding SNPs remain understudied, partly because they are challenging to prioritize for experimental validation. To address this deficiency, we developed the SNP effect matrix pipeline (SEMpl).

resultsSEMpl estimates transcription factor-binding affinity by observing differences in chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing signal intensity for SNPs within functional transcription factor-binding sites (TFBSs) genome-wide. By cataloging the effects of every possible mutation within the TFBS motif, SEMpl can predict the consequences of SNPs to transcription factor binding. This knowledge can be used to identify potential disease-causing regulatory loci. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SEMpl is available from https://github.com/Boyle-Lab/SEM_CPP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBinding SitesChromatin ImmunoprecipitationProtein BindingTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31373606
PMCPMC7999143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.