Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31373392›Full record

ReviewJournal of anatomy2019

What are the most accurate categories for mammal tarsus arrangement? A review with attention to South American Notoungulata and Litopterna.

Malena Lorente

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anatomy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malena LorenteConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de La Plata, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3723-0710
Centro Científico Tecnológico - La Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrangement of the tarsus has been used to differentiate afrotherian and laurasiatherian ungulates for more than a century, and it is often present in morphological matrices that include appendicular features. Traditionally, it has two states: (i) an alternating tarsus, where proximal elements are interlocked with central and distal elements positioned like the bricks of a wall; and (ii) a serial tarsus, where elements are not interlocked. Over the years, these states became synonymous with the presence or absence of an astragalocuboid contact. Within the South American order Notoungulata, a third disposition was recognized: the reversed alternating tarsus, associated with a calcaneonavicular contact. This state was considered to be a synapomorphy of 'advanced' Toxodontia families (Notohippidae, Leontiniidae and Toxodontidae), but a further inspection of its distribution shows that it occurs throughout Mammalia. Additionally, it overlaps the serial tarsus condition as originally defined, and it probably has no functional or phylogenetic significance. Calcaneonavicular and astragalocuboid contacts are non-exclusive, and their presence within a species, genus or family is not constant. Serial and alternating imply movements of the articulations of the mid-tarsus in the transverse axis, while reverse alternating refers to a small calcaneonavicular contact that sometimes occurs in a serial condition or to a significant displacement of the tarsal articulations in a different (proximodistal) axis. The proximodistal arrangement of the joints could be functionally significant. Two new states are observed and defined: (i) 'flipped serial', present in Macropodidae, in which the calcaneocuboid articulation is medially displaced and significantly larger than the astragalonavicular contact, but the relationships between proximal and central elements are one to one; and (ii) 'distal cuboid', an extreme proximodistal displacement of the astragalonavicular joint. Serial and alternating, as originally defined (i.e. without any reference to which bone contacts which), seem to be the best states for classifying tarsal arrangement though as the disposition of distal or central bones in relationship to proximal bones.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnkle JointMammalsTarsal BonesMammaliaMeridiungulatamorphologyphylogenytarsus

Identifiers

PMID31373392
PMCPMC6875937
OpenAlexW2966264484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.