Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31373327›Full record

ReviewMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Novel Delivery Systems for Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Purushottam Lamichhane, Rahul Deshmukh, Julie A Brown, Silvia Jakubski, Priyanka Parajuli, Todd Nolan, Dewan Raja, Mary Badawy, Thomas Yoon, Mark Zmiyiwsky and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in engineering local drug delivery systems for cancer immunotherapy.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. [Development of programmed death receptor-1 and programmed death receptor-1 ligand in oral squamous cell carcinoma].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2020
    Article
  16. Immunotherapies and Combination Strategies for Immuno-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. T lymphocyte-targeted immune checkpoint modulation in glioma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Purushottam LamichhaneSchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Rahul DeshmukhSchool of Pharmacy, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 5000 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Julie A BrownSchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Silvia JakubskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Priyanka ParajuliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL 62702, USA.
Todd NolanSchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Dewan RajaSchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Mary BadawySchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Thomas YoonSchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Mark ZmiyiwskySchool of Dental Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4800 Lakewood Ranch Blvd, Bradenton, FL 34211, USA.
Narottam LamichhaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. narulamichhane@umm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibition (CPI) therapies have been proven to be powerful clinical tools in treating cancers. FDA approvals and ongoing clinical development of checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of various cancers highlight the immense potential of checkpoint inhibitors as anti-cancer therapeutics. The occurrence of immune-related adverse events, however, is a major hindrance to the efficacy and use of checkpoint inhibitors as systemic therapies in a wide range of patients. Hence, methods of sustained and tumor-targeted delivery of checkpoint inhibitors are likely to improve efficacy while also decreasing toxic side effects. In this review, we summarize the findings of the studies that evaluated methods of tumor-targeted delivery of checkpoint inhibitors, review their strengths and weaknesses, and discuss the outlook for therapeutic use of these delivery methods.

Indexed as

bacterial deliveryDNA-encoded monoclonal antibodiesdrug delivery systemshematopoietic stem cellshydrogelsimmune-related adverse eventsnanobodiesplatelets as delivery vehiclesresistance to checkpoint blockadeviral delivery of checkpoint inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31373327
PMCPMC6789831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.