Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31372888›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Development of a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery.

Roshni Alam, Joel Montanez, Susan Law, Lawrence Lee, Nicolò Pecorelli, Yusuke Watanabe, Luciana D Chiavegato, Massimo Falconi, Satoshi Hirano, Nancy E Mayo and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03461497 (Value-Based Care in Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03461497 active not recruitingnot on this map

Value-Based Care in Abdominal Surgery: Measuring Recovery Outcomes That Matter to Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreRan2016 to 2026Enrolled530ConditionsAbdominal Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Improving recovery after bowel cancer surgery: mixed methods feasibility study of a co-produced information intervention (Recover Together).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Roshni AlamSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joel MontanezSt. Mary's Research Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Susan LawInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Lawrence LeeSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nicolò PecorelliDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Luciana D ChiavegatoDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary Division, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Massimo FalconiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Centre, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Nancy E MayoSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Liane S FeldmanSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julio Flavio FioreSteinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. julio.fiorejunior@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0019-8673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with robust measurement properties to assess postoperative recovery and support patient-centered care after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to establish a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery to support the development of a conceptually relevant and psychometrically sound PROM.

methodsPatients from four different countries (Canada, Italy, Brazil, and Japan) participated in qualitative interviews focusing on their lived experiences of recovery after abdominal surgery. Interviews were guided by a previously developed hypothesized conceptual framework established based on a literature review and expert consensus. Interviews were analyzed according to a modified grounded theory approach and transcripts were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Codes for which thematic saturation was reached were classified into domains of health that are relevant to the process of recovery after abdominal surgery. These domains were organized into a structured diagram.

results30 Patients with diverse demographics and surgical characteristics were interviewed (50% female, age 57 ± 18 years, 66% major or major extended surgery). 39 Unique domains of recovery emerged from the interviews, 17 falling under the ICF category of "Body Functions" and 22 under "Activities and Participation". These domains constitute the conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery.

conclusionsThis study provides comprehensive insight into patients' perspectives of the recovery process after abdominal surgery. This conceptual framework will support content validity and provide the pivotal basis for the development of a novel PROM to inform quality improvement initiatives and patient-centered research in abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAbdomenFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeAbdominal surgeryPatient-reported outcomePostoperative periodQuestionnairesRecovery of functionSelf-report

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.