ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Development of a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03461497 (Value-Based Care in Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Value-Based Care in Abdominal Surgery: Measuring Recovery Outcomes That Matter to Patients
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of enhanced recovery pathways on patient-reported outcomes after abdominal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Recovery of physical and mental health within 4 weeks after colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Improving recovery after bowel cancer surgery: mixed methods feasibility study of a co-produced information intervention (Recover Together).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024Article
- Recovery of health-related quality of life after laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The impact of minimally invasive surgery on hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and functional recovery after distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- ICF Linking and Cognitive Interviewing Are Complementary Methods for Optimizing Content Validity of Outcome Measures: An Integrated Methods Review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Review
- Development of a national survey on foot involvement among people with psoriatic arthritis in Australia using a best practice approach: a survey development protocol.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is a lack of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with robust measurement properties to assess postoperative recovery and support patient-centered care after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to establish a conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery to support the development of a conceptually relevant and psychometrically sound PROM.
methodsPatients from four different countries (Canada, Italy, Brazil, and Japan) participated in qualitative interviews focusing on their lived experiences of recovery after abdominal surgery. Interviews were guided by a previously developed hypothesized conceptual framework established based on a literature review and expert consensus. Interviews were analyzed according to a modified grounded theory approach and transcripts were coded according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Codes for which thematic saturation was reached were classified into domains of health that are relevant to the process of recovery after abdominal surgery. These domains were organized into a structured diagram.
results30 Patients with diverse demographics and surgical characteristics were interviewed (50% female, age 57 ± 18 years, 66% major or major extended surgery). 39 Unique domains of recovery emerged from the interviews, 17 falling under the ICF category of "Body Functions" and 22 under "Activities and Participation". These domains constitute the conceptual framework of recovery after abdominal surgery.
conclusionsThis study provides comprehensive insight into patients' perspectives of the recovery process after abdominal surgery. This conceptual framework will support content validity and provide the pivotal basis for the development of a novel PROM to inform quality improvement initiatives and patient-centered research in abdominal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31372888What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.