ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2020
Development of a novel ablation hood to prevent systemic embolization of microbubbles and particulate emboli.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing Microbubble Reduction to Facilitate IVUS Guidance During Endovascular Radiofrequency Wire Procedures.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtrial fibrillation ablation results in microbubbles and particulate emboli formation. We aimed to develop and test the early feasibility of a novel ablation hood to contain microbubbles and particulate emboli with the ultimate goal of preventing systemic embolization.
methodsIn seven canines, we developed, iterated, and tested a novel retractable hood that can cover the catheter-tissue ablation site. The number and volume (nL) of microbubbles formed during ablation with and without the hood was measured using an extracorporeal circulation loop. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used to compare the number of bubbles detected with and without the hood.
resultsThe hood reduced systemic embolization of microbubbles in 21/28 (75%) of ablations. Both atrial and ventricular ablations showed a statistically significant reduction in bubble number (476 ± 811 without hood vs 173 ± 226 with hood, p = 0.02; 2669 ± 1623 without hood vs 1417 ± 970 with hood, p = 0.04, respectively) and bubble volume (3.3 ± 7.6 nL without hood vs 0.2 ± 0.56 nL with hood, p = 0.006; 6.1 ± 5.2 nL without hood vs 1.9 ± 1.4 nL with hood, p = 0.05, respectively).
conclusionsUse of a novel hood to cover the ablation catheter at the site of catheter-tissue contact has the potential to provide a means to reduce systematic embolization of microbubbles. Further work is required to examine particulate emboli, but these data show the early feasibility of this design concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31372780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.