Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31372747›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Principles of patient-centred care and barriers to their implementation: a case study of breast reconstruction in Australia.

Kathy Flitcroft, Meagan Brennan, Andrew Spillane

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05222763 (Effect Of Web - Supported Interactıve Nursıng Program After Mastectomy On Body Value, Care Dependence And Psychosocıal Adaptatıon To Dısease-Self-Awareness Levels Accordıng To Self-Regulatıon Model), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05222763 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect Of Web - Supported Interactıve Nursıng Program After Mastectomy On Body Value, Care Dependence And Psychosocıal Adaptatıon To Dısease-Self-Awareness Levels Accordıng To Self-Regulatıon Model: Mıxed Method Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCumhuriyet UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled67ConditionsWeb Based Intervention, Mastectomy, Illness Perception, Nursing CariesArmsWeb-assisted patient education intervention designed according to the self-regulation model, The website where the mastectomy patients handbook
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy FlitcroftBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia. kathy.flitcroft@melanoma.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-0857
Meagan BrennanBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.
Andrew SpillaneBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUNorth Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre · AU

Funding

Friends of the Mater Foundation, North Sydney, Australia Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose"Patient-centred care" is widely promoted as an ideal goal of health care systems, but is often difficult to achieve in practice. This article has three aims: to develop an original set of generalisable patient-centred care principles (PCCPs); to identify barriers to the implementation of these principles in a real-world setting, using breast reconstruction (BR) services in Australia as a case study; and to document examples of successful patient-centred care in relation to BR.

methodsSemi-structured interviews (n = 90) were conducted with 31 breast and plastic reconstructive surgeons, 37 breast cancer health professionals and 22 women who underwent mastectomy as part of their breast cancer treatment and were dissatisfied with their BR experiences.

resultsTen broad PCCPs were derived from our participant interviews. These principles comprised the following: maximising patient choice, access to services, patient and family support and appropriateness of information; minimising patient costs and physical and psychosocial morbidity; and facilitating informed decision-making, interdisciplinary patient management and evidence-informed practice. While the major barriers to the implementation of these PCCPs in relation to BR were resource driven, surgeon-related factors were also identified.

conclusionsThese PCCPs highlight areas of need but also provide examples of high quality patient-centred care. They may help to guide a national discussion about minimum standards of BR practice, while allowing for some necessary regional and cultural variation. They also have the potential to be applied more widely to the provision of a range of health services within Australia or internationally.

Indexed as

AustraliaBreast NeoplasmsDecision MakingFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsAustraliaBreast reconstructionModels of carePatient-centred carePatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID31372747
OpenAlexW2964941390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.