ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020
Anatomical variations of the dentate gyrus in normal adult brain.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical Versus Functional Methods for Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation: Letter to the Editor Regarding the Manuscript "Altered Hippocampal Subfields Functional Connectivity in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Patients With Residual Dizziness: A Resting-State fMRI Study".CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Mapping mesoscale connectivity within the human hippocampus.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Effects of individualized brain anatomies and EEG electrode positions on inferred activity of the primary auditory cortex.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Stability of hippocampal subfield volumes after trauma and relationship to development of PTSD symptoms.NeuroImage · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent scientific papers indicate the clinical significance of the dentate gyrus. However, a detailed knowledge of the anatomical variations of this structure in normal adult brain is still lacking. An understanding of the variable morphology of the dentate gyrus may be important for diagnostic neuroimaging. Thus, the purpose of this macroscopic cadaveric study was to describe the anatomical variations of the dentate gyrus. Forty formalin-fixed human cerebral hemispheres, obtained from bodies of donors without the history of neuropathological diseases, were included in the study. The dentate gyrus was classified as well-developed, when it protruded completely from under the fimbria of the hippocampus. The gyrus was classified as underdeveloped, when it was covered by the fimbria of the hippocampus (but clearly visible at the coronal section of the hippocampal formation), while the hypoplastic gyrus was not visible macroscopically under the fimbria of the hippocampus. The well-developed type was observed in 27 cases (67.5%). The thickness of well-developed type of the dentate gyrus, measured between the fimbriodentate sulcus and hippocampal sulcus, varied from 2.74 to 5.21 mm (mean = 3.67 mm, median = 5.54 mm, SD 0.65 mm). In the next nine cases (22.5%), the dentate gyrus was underdeveloped. The thickness of underdeveloped type of the dentate gyrus varied from 1.75 to 2.37 mm (mean = 2.02 mm, median = 2.16 mm, SD 0.33 mm). In the remaining four cases (10%), the dentate gyrus was hypoplastic and could not be distinguished macroscopically. In all injected hemispheres, arterial supply of the dentate gyrus was provided by the branches of the posterior cerebral artery. Awareness of normal variations of the dentate gyrus may allow for better correlation of anatomical knowledge with radiological data and for use this knowledge to describe abnormal conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.