Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31372665›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2019

Impairments in reinforcement learning do not explain enhanced habit formation in cocaine use disorder.

T V Lim, R N Cardinal, G Savulich, P S Jones, A A Moustafa, T W Robbins, K D Ersche

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Listening to the Data: Computational Approaches to Addiction and Learning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T V LimDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
R N CardinalDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
G SavulichDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
P S JonesDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
A A MoustafaSchool of Social Sciences and Psychology, MARCS Institute for Brain and Behaviour, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
T W RobbinsDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK.
K D ErscheDepartments of Psychiatry, Psychology and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Building for Brain & Mind Sciences, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SZ, UK. ke220@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3203-1878
University of Cambridge · GBWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17213Medical Research Council MR/J012084/1Medical Research Council MR/M009041/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDrug addiction has been suggested to develop through drug-induced changes in learning and memory processes. Whilst the initiation of drug use is typically goal-directed and hedonically motivated, over time, drug-taking may develop into a stimulus-driven habit, characterised by persistent use of the drug irrespective of the consequences. Converging lines of evidence suggest that stimulant drugs facilitate the transition of goal-directed into habitual drug-taking, but their contribution to goal-directed learning is less clear. Computational modelling may provide an elegant means for elucidating changes during instrumental learning that may explain enhanced habit formation.

objectivesWe used formal reinforcement learning algorithms to deconstruct the process of appetitive instrumental learning and to explore potential associations between goal-directed and habitual actions in patients with cocaine use disorder (CUD).

methodsWe re-analysed appetitive instrumental learning data in 55 healthy control volunteers and 70 CUD patients by applying a reinforcement learning model within a hierarchical Bayesian framework. We used a regression model to determine the influence of learning parameters and variations in brain structure on subsequent habit formation.

resultsPoor instrumental learning performance in CUD patients was largely determined by difficulties with learning from feedback, as reflected by a significantly reduced learning rate. Subsequent formation of habitual response patterns was partly explained by group status and individual variation in reinforcement sensitivity. White matter integrity within goal-directed networks was only associated with performance parameters in controls but not in CUD patients.

conclusionsOur data indicate that impairments in reinforcement learning are insufficient to account for enhanced habitual responding in CUD.

Indexed as

HabitsReinforcement, PsychologyBayes TheoremBrainCocaine-Related DisordersDiscrimination LearningFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationPhotic StimulationAppetitive discrimination learningComputational modellingExtinctionGoal-directed learning/behaviourHabitHierarchical BayesianPerseverationPositive feedbackReinforcement sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID31372665
PMCPMC6695345
OpenAlexW2966584495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.