ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019
The use of text messaging for improving adherence to anti-diabetic regimen and glycaemic control in low-resource settings of South Africa: A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Perception of nurses on the use of mobile phone text messaging for the management of diabetes mellitus in rural Ghana.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Impact of Non-Tailored One-Way Automated Short Messaging Service (OASMS) on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Review of Ongoing Activities and Challenges to Improve the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Across Africa and the Implications for the Future.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the various innovations and treatment modalities, diabetes treatment outcomes remain sub-optimal globally and in South Africa. This places significant strain on the healthcare system. Text messaging is a cost-effective measure for promoting health. Yet, its effectiveness in improving diabetes treatment outcomes has not been documented in South Africa, especially in the resource-restrained settings. This study aims as determining the effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of text messaging in improving diabetes outcomes in low-resource settings of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial which will compare the use of text messaging in addition to diabetes standard care to standard care alone in promoting diabetes outcomes for six months. The study will be conducted at six primary healthcare centres in two selected districts in Eastern Cape, South Africa. The study requires 216 participants if an attrition rate of 20% is anticipated. Data will be collected at baseline and six months. Randomisation will follow baseline data collection using simple randomisation, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, after removing any identifying information. The primary outcome measure is a change in mean morning random blood sugar. Secondary outcomes include change in diabetes knowledge, medication adherence, self-management, health-related quality of life, mean blood pressure, weight and clinic attendance. Data will be obtained through self-reporting using validated measures, review of clinical records and objective measurements. Data collection and measurements will follow standard procedure. Data analysis will be based on the principle of Intention-to-treat.
trial registrationThis trial was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, trial number: PACTR201810599931422.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.