Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31372567›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS).

C Randler, S N Kolomeichuk, A V Morozov, D A Petrashova, V V Pozharskaya, A A Martynova, L S Korostovtseva, M V Bochkarev, Y V Sviryaev, M G Polouektov and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

C RandlerUniversity of Tuebingen, Department of Biology, Auf der Morgenstelle 24, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany.
S N KolomeichukLaboratory of Genetics, Institute of Biology of the Karelian Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia.
A V MorozovLaboratory of Ecological Physiology of Animals, Institute of Biology of the Karelian Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia.
D A PetrashovaKola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia.
V V PozharskayaKola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia.
A A MartynovaKola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk Region, Russia.
L S KorostovtsevaAlmazov National Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
M V BochkarevAlmazov National Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Y V SviryaevAlmazov National Medical Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
M G PolouektovI.M. Sechenov First Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
C DrakeHenry Ford Hospital Sleep Disorders and Research Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre · RUKola Science Centre · RUInstitute of Biology of Karelian Research Centre · RUHenry Ford Hospital · USSechenov University · RUUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insufficient sleep could severely impair both cognitive and learning skills. More prominent changes are found in children and adolescents. Tools used to estimate sleepiness in the adult population are commonly inappropriate for children. The objective of our study was to provide a reliable instrument to measure excessive sleepiness for upcoming studies in Russian-speaking children, applying the Russian version of Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS). The following tasks were resolved in our study: translation, validation, and analysis of psychometric properties of the Russian adaptation of the PDSS by standard tests. After the semantic validation of the instrument through a multi-stage translation process we checked its psychometric validation. A total of 552 students, consisting of N = 285 for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA), N = 267 for the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and N = 204 for test-retest analysis of public elementary schools located in Northern Russia completed the PDSS and Munich Chronotype Questionnaire to estimate sleep parameters in the classroom during the lessons. Response rate was 90%; excluded cases contained no data. Further, 204 of our participants completed the PDSS in a 3 months interval to check the test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficients and CFA was used to test factorial validity of the tool. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were assessed via intra-class coefficient. Internal consistency of the PDSS scale was high (Cronbach's α = 0.8). The construct validity of the PDSS was supported by CFA (factor loadings were from 0.438 to 0.727) and the test-retest reliability demonstrated by the intra-class coefficient was 0.70. The total PDSS score was independent of sex. The mean total value of PDSS was 11.95 ± 6.24. Higher scores on PDSS were negatively correlated with sleep duration. Thus, the construct validity of the instrument remains valid and could be used for Russian-speaking youth samples in the evaluation of daytime sleepiness. It could be useful in future applications by sleep scientists and health practitioners.

Indexed as

ChildrenClinical psychologyPediatric daytime sleepiness scalePediatricsPhysiologyPsychiatryPsychometricsSleep durationSleepiness

Identifiers

PMID31372567
PMCPMC6661285
OpenAlexW2963145448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.