ReviewInternational journal of endocrinology and metabolism2019
The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Results.
Review in International journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major mistakes in scientific medical writing based on manuscripts' reviews.La Tunisie medicale · 2024Article
- Writing for Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS): There is something new and interesting in this article!Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Which articles do the editors prefer to publish?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2022Article
- What Nonnative Authors Should Know When Writing Research Articles in English.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Citation.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Review
- What are the expectations of an editor from a scientific article?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2020Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Abstract and Keywords.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Review
- How to write that paper.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Title.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- Data Extraction from Graphs Using Adobe Photoshop: Applications for Meta-Analyses.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- Utilizing tables, figures, charts and graphs to enhance the readability of a research paper.Journal of postgraduate medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "results section" of a scientific paper provides the results related to all measurements and outcomes that have been posted earlier in the materials and methods section. This section consists of text, figures, and tables presenting detailed data and facts without interpretation and discussion. Results may be presented in chronological order, general to specific order, most to least important order, or may be organized according to the topic/study groups or experiment/measured parameters. The primary content of this section includes the most relevant results that correspond to the central question stated in the introduction section, whether they support the hypothesis or not. Findings related to secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses may be reported in this section. All results should be presented in a clear, concise, and sensible manner. In this review, we discuss the function, content, and organization of the "results section," as well as the principles and the most common tips for the writing of this section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.