ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences
Amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation of patients with rheumatic heart disease after valve replacement.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo explore the efficacy of amiodarone in the treatment of atrial fibrillation for patients with rheumatic heart disease after valve replacement.
methodsEighty-six patients with rheumatic heart disease who were hospitalized between June 2016 and June 2017 and developed atrial fibrillation after valvular heart valve replacement were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, 42 cases in each group. The control group was treated with routine medical treatment, while the observation group was given amiodarone on the basis of routine treatment. The cardiac function of the two groups were observed and recorded. Postoperative atrial fibrillation conversion rate, sinus rhythm maintenance rate, intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring time and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the control group, the improvement of cardiac function indexes of the observation group was better, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The atrial fibrillation conversion rate and the maintenance rate of sinus rhythm of the observation group were 76.2% and 47.6% respectively, which were significantly higher than 57.1% and 33.3% of the control group; the differences had statistical significance (P<0.05). The ICU monitoring time and hospitalization time of the patients in the observation group were (1.69±0.91) d and (10.24±1.11) d respectively, which were significantly shorter than (2.83±0.95) d and (14.07±1.17) d in the control group (P<0.05); the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).
conclusionAmiodarone can effectively treat valve replacement associated atrial fibrillation of patients with rheumatic heart disease. It can significantly improve the heart function, prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, maintain sinus rhythm after operation, and shorten the time of ICU monitoring and hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.