ReviewOpen access rheumatology : research and reviews2019
Management of refractory lupus nephritis: challenges and solutions.
Review in Open access rheumatology : research and reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Guideline
- Serum vs. tissue cytokine dysregulation in SLE-associated myocarditis: a hypothesis from an African cohort perspective.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Repeat renal biopsy findings in 82 lupus nephritis patients: a clinicopathological study.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2025Article
- Renal remodeling by CXCL10-CXCR3 axis-recruited mesenchymal stem cells and subsequent IL4I1 secretion in lupus nephritis.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Article
- Current cell therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with lupus nephritis.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Lupus Nephritis Outcomes after Stopping Immunosuppression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Schistosoma antigens: A future clinical magic bullet for autoimmune diseases?Parasite (Paris, France) · 2024Review
- Daratumumab monotherapy for refractory lupus nephritis.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Recent advances in immunotherapies for lupus nephritis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023Review
- Expansion of extrafollicular B and T cell subsets in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Management practice and treatment outcomes of adult patients with Lupus Nephritis at the Renal Clinic of St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Rituximab Therapy for Lupus Nephritis Among SLE Female Patients; a Retrospective Hospital-Based Study.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory lupus nephritis, broadly defined as failure to attain clinical remission after appropriate induction immunosuppressive therapy, is associated with an increased risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease and mortality. This is a challenging issue in clinical practice, as modern induction therapy despite proven efficacy can still be associated with treatment failure. Moreover, newer therapies have failed in recent years to displace or even match existing protocols for effective induction of remission. Refractory disease is generally assessed on the basis of clinical parameters, which may be unreliable, and renal biopsy, which is often not performed in a standard or timely fashion. Persisting histological inflammation in 30%-50% of patients who have attained clinical remission highlights the disparity between clinical and immunological response to therapy. The lack of an international consensus regarding what constitutes refractory lupus nephritis compounds clinician indecision regarding optimal management for these patients. Moreover, non-adherence to prescribed therapy versus primary treatment failure can be challenging to discriminate, and the time point at which non-response becomes treatment failure is unclear. In this review, we assess the key published evidence for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and provide practical recommendations based around the use of adjunctive therapies. These agents include rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors, with evidence consisting largely of observational or uncontrolled studies, as well as some of the biologic therapies currently under investigation through prospective clinical trials. The poor prognosis of refractory lupus nephritis demands regular review of patient response and the flexibility to switch or augment therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.