ArticleInternational journal of women's health2019
Engaging study participants in interpreting results: lessons from the TRIO study in Kenya and South Africa.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Giving voice to the end-user: input on multipurpose prevention technologies from the perspectives of young women in Kenya and South Africa.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2021Trial
- Preferences for characteristics of contraceptive methods: a large, multi-country discrete choice experiment.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Community engagement in research addressing infectious diseases of poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- COVID-19 and unintended steps towards further equity in global health research.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Article
- Synthesis of end-user research to inform future multipurpose prevention technologies in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Article
- Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review.Studies in family planning · 2022Review
- Introducing the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Can We Learn from Oral PrEP?Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2021Review
- Towards a roadmap to advance non-hormonal contraceptive multipurpose prevention technologies: strategic insights from key stakeholders†.Biology of reproduction · 2020Review
- "I felt like a TRIO champion": end-user perspectives on their role as co-designers of multi-purpose technologies.Gates open research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.