Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31372057›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology2019

A systematic review of the international prevalence of

Nigel Armstrong, Steve Ryder, Carol Forbes, Janine Ross, Ruben Gw Quek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of germlineMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. GermlineCancers · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nigel ArmstrongHealth Economics, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York YO19 6FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7443-4798
Steve RyderHealth Economics, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York YO19 6FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1177-416X
Carol ForbesSystematic Reviews, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York YO19 6FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-8455
Janine RossInformation, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd ., York YO19 6FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4763-2078
Ruben Gw QuekHealth Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc., San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9602-3239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted, summarizing international

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2chemotherapyprevalencesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31372057
PMCPMC6628947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.