ReviewJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2019
Navigation-Assisted Orbital Trauma Reconstruction Using a Bioactive Osteoconductive/Bioresorbable u-HA/PLLA System.
Review in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison between Metal Mesh and Iliac Bonegraft in the Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Fracture-A Clinical Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Implants: Scoping Review and Clinical Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Tongue-in-Groove: A Novel Implant Design for a Blow-Out Fracture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A novel fluffy PLGA/HA composite scaffold for bone defect repair.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- 3D Printing of PLLA/Biomineral Composite Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bioactive Regeneration Potential of the Newly Developed Uncalcined/Unsintered Hydroxyapatite and Poly-l-Lactide-Co-Glycolide Biomaterial in Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: An In Vivo Preliminary Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bone Coverage around Hydroxyapatite/Poly(Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes with and without surgical navigation for fracture of the orbital wall.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021Article
- Biomechanical Loading Comparison between Titanium and Bioactive Resorbable Screw Systems for Fixation of Intracapsular Condylar Head Fractures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Bone Regeneration Potential of Uncalcined and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly l-lactide Bioactive/Osteoconductive Sheet Used for Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery: An In Vivo Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital fractures with orbital wall defects are common facial fractures encountered by oral-maxillofacial surgeons, because of the exposed position and thin bony walls of the midface. The primary goal of surgery is to restore the pre-injury anatomy and volume of hard tissue, and to free incarcerated or prolapsed orbital tissue from the fracture by bridging the bony defects with reconstructive implant material and restoring the maxillofacial-orbital skeleton. Numerous studies have reported orbital fracture repair with a wide variety of implant materials that offer various advantages and disadvantages. The ideal orbital implant material will allow conformation to individual patients' anatomical characteristics, remain stable over time, and are radiopaque, especially for the reconstruction of relatively large and/or complex bony walls. Based on these requirements, novel uncalcined and unsintered hydroxyapatite (u-HA) particles and poly-L-lactide (PLLA; u-HA/PLLA) composite sheets could be used as innovative, bioactive, and osteoconductive/bioresorbable implant materials for orbital reconstruction. In addition, intraoperative navigation is a powerful tool. Navigation- and computer-assisted surgeries have improved execution and predictability, allowing for greater precision, accuracy, and minimal invasiveness during orbital trauma reconstructive surgery of relatively complex and large orbital wall defects with ophthalmological malfunctions and deformities. This review presents an overview of navigation-assisted orbital trauma reconstruction using a bioactive, osteoconductive/bioresorbable u-HA/PLLA system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.