Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371794›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2020

Meta-analysis of preoperative oral nutritional supplements for patients with gastric cancer: East Asian experience.

Xinrong Chen, Kun Yang, Xingxia Zhang, Ka Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Summary of the best evidence for perioperative enteral nutrition management in patients with laryngeal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Preferences for oral nutritional supplement therapy among postoperative patients with gastric cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinrong ChenWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Kun YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Xingxia ZhangWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Ka LiWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China. likalika127127@163.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether it is beneficial to give preoperative oral nutritional supplements (P-ONS) to gastric cancer (GC) patients is still inconclusive. This study aimed to systematically explore the effectiveness and safety of P-ONS in GC patients. The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedicine Literature Database (SinoMed), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases were searched to identify relevant literature. A total of 11 randomized controlled trials (1183 patients) were included. Meta-analysis showed significantly lower levels of white blood cells (MD, -0.65; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.30; P = 0.0003) and C-reactive protein (MD, -0.24; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.16; P < 0.00001) in the P-ONS group than those in the routine diet group. Compared with the routine diet group, the P-ONS group had higher levels of albumin (MD, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.40-2.87; P = 0.010), IgG (MD, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86; P < 0.00001), IgA (MD, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.02-0.37; P = 0.03), CD4

Indexed as

Stomach NeoplasmsHumansNutritional StatusPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Period

Identifiers

PMID31371794
OpenAlexW2965874405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.