Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371744›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Biofilm formation capacity and presence of virulence factors among commensal Enterococcus spp. from wild birds.

Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak, Tomasz Hauschild, Urszula Kosikowska, Marta Dec, Renata Urban-Chmiel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Essential Oils AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Overview of the Factors Involved in Biofilm Production by theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dagmara Stępień-PyśniakDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland. dagmara.stepien@up.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-1007
Tomasz HauschildDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Biology, University of Bialystok, Białystok, Poland.
Urszula KosikowskaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology with Laboratory for Microbiological Diagnostics, Medical University in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4536-1750
Marta DecDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Renata Urban-ChmielDepartment of Veterinary Prevention and Avian Diseases, Institute of Biological Bases of Animal Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8245-1646
University of Life Sciences in Lublin · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLUniversity of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are opportunistic pathogens that can form biofilms during infections and many virulence determinants are involved in this process. Although the virulence factors are often analysed in Enterococcus spp. from humans and food animals, little is known about gut enterococcal isolates from wild birds. Therefore, the determination of virulence factors among enterococci isolated from wild birds may provide new information about a possible source of infection for humans and animals or vice versa via the environment. We analysed different phenotypic and genotypic traits in enterococci from wild birds related to potential virulence in humans and animals and to evaluate biofilm formation and its relationship to virulence genes. The E. faecalis isolates were characterised by greater frequency of biofilm formation in BHI than E. faecium. There was a correlation between hydrophobicity and biofilm formation in BHI broth in E. faecalis. None of the isolates was haemolytic. The presence of some adhesion and gelatinase genes was detected in biofilm-positive isolates. The enterococcal pathogenic factors (esp, hyl, and cyl operon genes) did not seem to be necessary or sufficient for production of biofilm by analysed bacteria. Enterococcus species isolated from wild birds should be considered as a possible source of some virulence determinants.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsBirdsCloacaEnterococcusFecesGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOperonOpportunistic InfectionsSymbiosisVirulenceVirulence FactorsBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID31371744
PMCPMC6671946
OpenAlexW2966054831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.