Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371713›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Automatic and feature-specific prediction-related neural activity in the human auditory system.

Gianpaolo Demarchi, Gaëtan Sanchez, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Eavesdropping on Tinnitus Using MEG: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gianpaolo DemarchiCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Division of Physiological Psychology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. gianpaolo.demarchi@sbg.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-9298
Gaëtan SanchezCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Division of Physiological Psychology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-721X
Nathan WeiszCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Division of Physiological Psychology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstraße 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior experience enables the formation of expectations of upcoming sensory events. However, in the auditory modality, it is not known whether prediction-related neural signals carry feature-specific information. Here, using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we examined whether predictions of future auditory stimuli carry tonotopic specific information. Participants passively listened to sound sequences of four carrier frequencies (tones) with a fixed presentation rate, ensuring strong temporal expectations of when the next stimulus would occur. Expectation of which frequency would occur was parametrically modulated across the sequences, and sounds were occasionally omitted. We show that increasing the regularity of the sequence boosts carrier-frequency-specific neural activity patterns during both the anticipatory and omission periods, indicating that prediction-related neural activity is indeed feature-specific. Our results illustrate that even without bottom-up input, auditory predictions can activate tonotopically specific templates.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory CortexAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMultivariate AnalysisResearch DesignSoundVolunteersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31371713
PMCPMC6672009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.