Observational studyThe oncologist2019
Patient-Reported Factors in Treatment Satisfaction in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).
Observational study in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial.Blood cancer journal · 2022Trial
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Findings From the Phase III MAIA Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021Trial
- Shared Decision-Making in Treatment Selection in Multiple Myeloma in Spain: The PRISMMA Study.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Financial Toxicity, Time Toxicity, and Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2024Article
- Patient, Care Partner, and Physician Voices in Treatment Decision-Making for Multiple Myeloma.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- A pilot study of adherence to lenalidomide among older patients with multiple myeloma.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Patient perspectives on symptoms, health-related quality of life, and treatment experience associated with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- A Focus on Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022Article
- Preferences and Priorities for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma Treatments Among Patients and Caregivers in the United States.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Cost Effectiveness of Triplet Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone (XVd) in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma (MM) Based on Results from the Phase III BOSTON Trial.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Article
- Access to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.Advances in therapy · 2021Article
- Oral therapy adherence and satisfaction in patients with multiple myeloma.Annals of hematology · 2021Observational
- Management of patients with multiple myeloma beyond the clinical-trial setting: understanding the balance between efficacy, safety and tolerability, and quality of life.Blood cancer journal · 2021Review
- Network Meta-Analysis of Once Weekly Selinexor-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2021Article
- US Budget Impact Model for Selinexor, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapy choices in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) should consider patient satisfaction with treatment, because it is associated with adherence to therapy, health outcomes, and medical safety. The primary objective of this pilot cross-sectional observational study was to ascertain factors associated with patient-reported treatment satisfaction in RRMM. PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients with a self-reported diagnosis of RRMM recruited from PatientsLikeMe, MyelomaCrowd, and Facebook were administered an electronic survey that included questions on demographics and clinical history, treatment experience, economic burden, and standardized patient-reported outcome measures, including the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) measure, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem V2.0. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of patient-perceived treatment satisfaction.
resultsOne hundred sixty patients with RRMM participated in the study, with a median of two prior relapses and 66.3% reporting the most recent relapse within the last 12 months. ECOG PS ≥2 was associated with lower patient-reported global satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of current treatment. In addition to shorter time spent receiving therapy, orally administered treatment was the strongest predictor of higher satisfaction with treatment convenience. For patients receiving an injectable drug-containing regimen versus an all-oral regimen, respectively, time spent receiving multiple myeloma-directed therapy was higher (12.6 vs. 4.0 hours per month), and total monthly indirect costs were $1,033 and $241.
conclusionPoor ECOG PS was linked to reduced treatment satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of current therapy, whereas an all-oral regimen was associated with increased treatment convenience satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study suggests that attributes including better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, less time spent receiving treatment, and oral route of treatment administration lead to higher patient-perceived satisfaction with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treatment. Oral route of administration was also associated with less time spent receiving treatment and reduced economic burden for patients. Increased attention to these factors in shared treatment decision making is warranted to help identify individual patient needs, preferences, and expectations for RRMM treatments, to resolve dissatisfaction issues, and to improve the experience of patients with RRMM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.