Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371501›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Contrasting evolution of virulence and replication rate in an emerging bacterial pathogen.

Luc Tardy, Mathieu Giraudeau, Geoffrey E Hill, Kevin J McGraw, Camille Bonneaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Investigating Pathogenicity and Virulence ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luc TardyCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Mathieu GiraudeauCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Geoffrey E HillDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5414.ORCID 0000-0001-8864-6495
Kevin J McGrawSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501.
Camille BonneaudCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR10 9FE Cornwall, United Kingdom; c.bonneaud@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host resistance through immune clearance is predicted to favor pathogens that are able to transmit faster and are hence more virulent. Increasing pathogen virulence is, in turn, typically assumed to be mediated by increasing replication rates. However, experiments designed to test how pathogen virulence and replication rates evolve in response to increasing host resistance, as well as the relationship between the two, are rare and lacking for naturally evolving host-pathogen interactions. We inoculated 55 isolates of

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsBiological EvolutionDisease ResistanceModels, BiologicalAnimalsBird DiseasesNorth AmericaSongbirdsVirulence FactorsVirulence Factorsbacteriaemerging infectious diseaseevolution of resistanceevolution of virulencepathogen load

Identifiers

PMID31371501
PMCPMC6708350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.