Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371301›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Rationale, development and feasibility of group antenatal care for immigrant women in Sweden: a study protocol for the Hooyo Project.

Ulrika Byrskog, Malin Ahrne, Rhonda Small, Ewa Andersson, Birgitta Essen, Aisha Adan, Fardosa Hassen Ahmed, Karin Tesser, Yvonne Lidén, Monika Israelsson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ulrika ByrskogSchool of Education, Health and Social sciences, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden uby@du.se.ORCID 0000-0002-1713-6014
Malin AhrneDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rhonda SmallMother and Child Health Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ewa AnderssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Birgitta EssenWomens and Childrens Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Aisha AdanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fardosa Hassen AhmedDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin TesserAntenatal Care Clinic, Domnarvet, Borlänge, Sweden.
Yvonne LidénAntenatal Care Clinic, Spånga-Tensta, Sweden.
Monika IsraelssonAntenatal Care Clinic, Spånga-Tensta, Sweden.
Anna Åhman-BerndtssonAntenatal Care Clinic, Domnarvet, Borlänge, Sweden.
Erica SchyttCentre for Clinical Research Dalarna-Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSomali-born women comprise a large group of immigrant women of childbearing age in Sweden, with increased risks for perinatal morbidity and mortality and poor experiences of care, despite the goal of providing equitable healthcare for the entire population. Rethinking how care is provided may help to improve outcomes. OVERALL

aimTo develop and test the acceptability, feasibility and immediate impacts of group antenatal care for Somali-born immigrant women, in an effort to improve experiences of antenatal care, knowledge about childbearing and the Swedish healthcare system, emotional well-being and ultimately, pregnancy outcomes. This protocol describes the rationale, planning and development of the study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An intervention development and feasibility study. Phase I includes needs assessment and development of contextual understanding using focus group discussions. In phase II, the intervention and evaluation tools, based on core values for quality care and person-centred care, are developed. Phase III includes the historically controlled evaluation in which relevant outcome measures are compared for women receiving individual care (2016-2018) and women receiving group antenatal care (2018-2019): care satisfaction (Migrant Friendly Maternity Care Questionnaire), emotional well-being (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), social support, childbirth fear, knowledge of Swedish maternity care, delivery outcomes. Phase IV includes the process evaluation, investigate process, feasibility and mechanisms of impact using field notes, observations, interviews and questionnaires. All phases are conducted in collaboration with a stakeholder reference group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm, Sweden. Participants receive information about the study and their right to decline/withdraw without consequences. Consent is given prior to enrolment. Findings will be disseminated at antenatal care units, national/international conferences, through publications in peer-reviewed journals, seminars involving stakeholders, practitioners, community and via the project website. Participating women will receive a summary of results in their language.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSomaliaSwedenYoung Adultfeasibility studygroup antenatal careimmigrantsmidwivesprocess evaluationsomali-born women

Identifiers

PMID31371301
PMCPMC6677950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.