Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371288›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

A cross-sectional study of self-rated health among older adults: a comparison of China and the United States.

Dongjuan Xu, Greg Arling, Kefang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Poor Self-Rated Health and Associated Factors among Older Persons in Malaysia: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hierarchical Regression of Wellbeing and Self-Rated Health among Older Adults in Abu Dhabi.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dongjuan XuSchool of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA xu976@purdue.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8265-1912
Greg ArlingSchoolf of Nursing, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Kefang WangSchool of Nursing, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe used nationally representative samples of China and the US older population to investigate (1) whether factors influencing self-rated health among older Chinese were similar to those among older Americans; and (2) whether there was a significant cross-national difference in self-rated health between China and the USA after controlling those available influencing factors.

designA cross-sectional study. Data came from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study and China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study conducted from 2014 to 2015.

participantsOur final sample size totaled 8905 older adults in the USA and 4442 older adults in China. OUTCOME: The response variable was self-rated health. Ordered logistic regression models were conducted to investigate factors influencing self-rated health among older adults.

resultsMore than three-fourths (78%) of older adults in China reported fair or poor health status, while almost 74% of older adults in the USA reported excellent, very good or good health status. In the overall ordered logistic regression model, when controlling statistically for sociodemographics, family structure, functional limitations, cognition, chronic conditions, mental health and health-related behaviours, the Chinese survey respondents were much more likely to rate their health as being poorer than the US respondents. The odds of having better versus poorer health was almost five times greater in American older adults than those in China (OR=4.88, 95% CI 4.06 to 5.86). Older adults in China living alone rated their health better than those living with spouse/partner; however, no significant difference was found between these two living arrangements in older Americans. In contrast, older adults in the USA living with others rated their health worse compared with those living with spouse/partner. In addition, older adults who had more activities of daily living limitations, poorer self-reported memory, worse mental health and chronic health conditions had lower self-rated health in both countries.

conclusionsWe found a striking difference in self-rated health between China and the USA even after controlling for measures of disease, functional status and other influencing factors. Relative to their American counterparts, Chinese elders were much more likely to report worse health.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCross-Cultural ComparisonHealth StatusAgedAged, 80 and overChinaChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersResidence CharacteristicsRetirementchinaliving arrangementolder adultsself-rated healththe united states

Identifiers

PMID31371288
PMCPMC6677996
OpenAlexW2965695036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.