Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371131›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2019

The safety and the efficacy of computed tomography guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma.

Cennet Sahin, Yunus Oc, Naim Ediz, Mustafa Altınay, Aylin Hasanefendioğlu Bayrak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Osteoid osteoma: which is the best mininvasive treatment option?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cennet SahinUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Radiology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: cennetsahin2@hotmail.com.
Yunus OcBagcilar Medilife Hospital, Orthopedic Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: yunti72@gmail.com.
Naim EdizUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: naimediz@gmail.com.
Mustafa AltınaySanlıurfa Ceylanpınar State Hospital, Anestesiology, Urfa, Turkey. Electronic address: m_altinay@yahoo.com.
Aylin Hasanefendioğlu BayrakUniversity of Health Sciences, Istanbul GOP Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Radiology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: aylin_has@yahoo.com.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRBağcılar Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRState Hospital · GBTaksim German Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of Computed Tomography (CT) guided percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) in the treatment of osteoid osteoma (OO).

methodsA total of 116 patients (82 male and 34 female patients; mean age of 17.7 years; age range 13-months-42 years) who had 118 CT guided RFA treatment between June 2015 and November 2018 (42 moths) with the diagnosis of OO were included in this study. All the patients had pre-procedural CT examinations. The clinical and technical success and the safety of the treatment were evaluated by assessing the clinical pain symptoms, complication rates and recovery of posture and gait.

resultsAll the patients had a favorable immediate relief of the known pain caused by osteoid osteoma in 24 h after the procedure. Only in two patients (15-years-old boy with OO in right femoral neck and a 12 years old boy with OO in femur diaphysis) pain relapse was occurred in 3 months and 12 months after RFA and a second RFA was performed. During follow-up they had no pain. The technical success and efficacy-rates of the procedure were recorded as 100% and 98% respectively in this study. No significant complication was observed during treatment or recovery period. Seven minor complications were noted which were successfully treated.

conclusionThe rapid relief of pain symptoms, low relapse rate and low complication rates demonstrate the efficacy and safety of RFA therapy. RFA is an out-patient procedure that patients can be mobilized immediately after the procedure. RFA can be safely used as a first choice of treatment method in OO therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCatheter AblationOsteoma, OsteoidPainPostoperative ComplicationsAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleRecurrenceReoperationSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeEfficacyOsteoid osteomaRadio frequency ablationSafetyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID31371131
PMCPMC6819852
OpenAlexW2966151453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.