ArticleBiology direct2019
Massive metagenomic data analysis using abundance-based machine learning.
Article in Biology direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MetaPhlAn 4 profiling of unknown species-level genome bins improves the characterization of diet-associated microbiome changes in mice.Cell reports · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and bioinformatics: a journey from traditional techniques to smart approaches.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2024Review
- Article
- MegaD: Deep Learning for Rapid and Accurate Disease Status Prediction of Metagenomic Samples.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Human disease prediction from microbiome data by multiple feature fusion and deep learning.iScience · 2022Article
- Global mapping of cancers: The Cancer Genome Atlas and beyond.Molecular oncology · 2021Review
- Serine and one-carbon metabolisms bring new therapeutic venues in prostate cancer.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Emerging roles of the HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligases in hematological malignancies.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- The expression of ELOVL4, repressed by MYCN, defines neuroblastoma patients with good outcome.Oncogene · 2021Article
- Comparison of 16S and whole genome dog microbiomes using machine learning.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2021Review
- Involvement of transcribed lncRNA uc.291 and SWI/SNF complex in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2021Article
- MegaR: an interactive R package for rapid sample classification and phenotype prediction using metagenome profiles and machine learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Metagenomic Geolocation Prediction Using an Adaptive Ensemble Classifier.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Literature on Applied Machine Learning in Metagenomic Classification: A Scoping Review.Biology · 2020Article
- The ZNF750-RAC1 axis as potential prognostic factor for breast cancer.Cell death discovery · 2020Article
- A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling.Biology direct · 2020Article
- Metagenomic Studies in Inflammatory Skin Diseases.Current microbiology · 2020Review
- Environmental metagenome classification for constructing a microbiome fingerprint.Biology direct · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetagenomics is the application of modern genomic techniques to investigate the members of a microbial community directly in their natural environments and is widely used in many studies to survey the communities of microbial organisms that live in diverse ecosystems. In order to understand the metagenomic profile of one of the densest interaction spaces for millions of people, the public transit system, the MetaSUB international Consortium has collected and sequenced metagenomes from subways of different cities across the world. In collaboration with CAMDA, MetaSUB has made the metagenomic samples from these cities available for an open challenge of data analysis including, but not limited in scope to, the identification of unknown samples.
resultsTo distinguish the metagenomic profiling among different cities and also predict unknown samples precisely based on the profiling, two different approaches are proposed using machine learning techniques; one is a read-based taxonomy profiling of each sample and prediction method, and the other is a reduced representation assembly-based method. Among various machine learning techniques tested, the random forest technique showed promising results as a suitable classifier for both approaches. Random forest models developed from read-based taxonomic profiling could achieve an accuracy of 91% with 95% confidence interval between 80 and 93%. The assembly-based random forest model prediction also reached 90% accuracy. However, both models achieved roughly the same accuracy on the testing test, whereby they both failed to predict the most abundant label.
conclusionOur results suggest that both read-based and assembly-based approaches are powerful tools for the analysis of metagenomics data. Moreover, our results suggest that reduced representation assembly-based methods are able to simultaneous provide high-accuracy prediction on available data. Overall, we show that metagenomic samples can be traced back to their location with careful generation of features from the composition of microbes and utilizing existing machine learning algorithms. Proposed approaches show high accuracy of prediction, but require careful inspection before making any decisions due to sample noise or complexity. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Eugene V. Koonin, Jing Zhou and Serghei Mangul.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.