Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370892›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

State-of-the-art for CAR T-cell therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 2019.

Richard Lemal, Olivier Tournilhac

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The importance ofMolecular biology research communications · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transcriptomic analysis of the innate immune response toMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard LemalHistocompatibility laboratory, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM CIC501, EA 7453 -Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France. rlemal@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-5767-1628
Olivier TournilhacAdult Clinical Hematology, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INSERM CIC501, EA 7453 -Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience in the use of CAR T cells to treat CLL is limited, but safety and efficacy data are encouraging, suggesting that it may be possible to use CAR T cells in populations of CLL patients with particularly unfavorable prognoses. Mechanisms intrinsic to the pathophysiology of CLL undoubtedly explain the efficacy reported based on limited data for the first few series, and underlie the rationale of successive modulations in lymphodepletion schemes, transgene constructs, and, finally, the therapeutic association of CAR T cells with ibrutinib, which appears to be particularly promising. This review describes the published results and expected developments.

Indexed as

AdenineCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellPiperidinesPrognosisPyrazolesPyrimidinesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTreatment OutcomeAdenineibrutinibPiperidinesPyrazolesPyrimidinesReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T cellsCLLIbrutinib

Identifiers

PMID31370892
PMCPMC6676603
OpenAlexW2966852661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.