Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370881›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Time-related changes in quality of life in persons with lower limb amputation or spinal cord injury: protocol for a systematic review.

Matthew Young, Carly McKay, Sean Williams, Peter Rouse, James L J Bilzon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Combat amputee care for Global War on Terror Veterans: A systematic review.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Quality of Life of People with Mobility-Related Disabilities in Sweden: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Expression of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway genes and its related inflammatory factors in secondary spinal cord injury].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew YoungDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Carly McKayDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Sean WilliamsDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Peter RouseDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
James L J BilzonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. J.Bilzon@bath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6701-7603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperiencing a lower limb amputation (LLA) or spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-changing event, affecting physical and systemic function as well as having psychological and social impacts. However, the severity of the physical impairment and/or motor disability demonstrates a poor relationship with patient-reported quality of life, suggesting that other factors determine such outcomes. As such, holistic health-related quality of life (QoL) assessment is an important tool to monitor long-term outcomes. While there are some studies that have assessed the influence of variables such as age at time of injury occurrence and time since injury on changes in QoL, there are no systematic reviews which synthesise this evidence. METHODS/

designAll follow-up study designs will be included, where data from multiple time points are presented. Searches will target both SCI and LLA populations where a validated measure of QoL has been used: Medical Outcome Study Short-Form 36/12 or the World Health Organization Quality of Life instruments 100 and BREF. Studies must include adult participants (≥ 18 years at time of injury) and detail time since injury event and patient age. The primary objective is to establish the effects of participant age and time since injury on QoL scores. Secondary objectives include determining between-group effects (i.e. LLA vs. SCI). We will search PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases, supplemented by hand-searching references within existing review articles and experimental studies. Reviewer pairs will conduct screening and quality assessment of included papers. Results will be stratified by impairment, QoL tool, age/time since injury and additional variables such as sex, race, comorbidity or disease aetiology, as appropriate. If sufficient high-quality data exist, a meta-analysis will be conducted. DISCUSSION: The results of this systematic review will summarise evidence of how QoL changes across the life course, relative to both patient age and time since injury, for both LLA and SCI populations. By enabling a direct comparison of different chronic conditions, disability-specific differences in QoL changes over the life course can be identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018096633 .

Indexed as

Life Change EventsLower ExtremityAge FactorsAmputation, SurgicalHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeSpinal Cord InjuriesSystematic Reviews as TopicTime FactorsLower limb amputationQuality of lifeSF-36Spinal cord injurySystematic reviewWHOQOL

Identifiers

PMID31370881
PMCPMC6676595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.