Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370794›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2019

Patients' time perception in the waiting room of an ambulatory emergency unit: a cross-sectional study.

Hervé Spechbach, Jessica Rochat, Jean-Michel Gaspoz, Christian Lovis, Frederic Ehrler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Barriers to emergency department usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hervé SpechbachDivision of Primary Care Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jessica RochatFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jean-Michel GaspozDivision of Primary Care Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian LovisFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frederic EhrlerDivision of Medical Information Sciences, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland. frederic.ehrler@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-3242

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient satisfaction has become an increasingly important element in a service-oriented healthcare market. Although satisfaction is influenced by many factors, the waiting time to be seen by medical staff has been shown to be one of the key criteria. However, waiting is not an objective experience and several factors can influence its perception.

methodsWe conducted a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study among patients attending the emergency unit of a Swiss university hospital in order to explore the key factors influencing wait perception.

resultsA total of 509 patients participated in the study. Appropriate assessment of emergency level by caregivers, the feeling of being forgotten, respect of privacy, and lack of information on the exact waiting time were identified as significant variables for wait perception.

conclusionsOur study confirmed the existence of a 'golden hour' when the patient is willing to wait until the medical encounter. In case the wait cannot be limited, an appropriate assessment of the emergency level by caregivers and avoiding the patients of feeling being forgotten are very important factors to avoid a negative perception of the waiting time before seeing a doctor.

trial registration(ID REQ-2016-00555).

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPatient SatisfactionProfessional-Patient RelationsTime PerceptionAdultAgedAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsSurveys and QuestionnairesEmergency departmentPatient satisfactionPerceived waiting timeService-oriented health careWaiting time

Identifiers

PMID31370794
PMCPMC6676522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.