Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370793›Full record

ReviewBMC anesthesiology2019

Effect of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane related emergence agitation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Dan Tan, Haifa Xia, Shujun Sun, Fuquan Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Review in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Inhalational anesthetics].Der Anaesthesist · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dan TanEditorial Office, Journal of New Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, No.169 Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei Province, China. tandan_dta@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7236-7192
Haifa XiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shujun SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fuquan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Union Hospital · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe comparative efficacy of ancillary drugs on sevoflurane related emergence agitation (EA) in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery remains controversial.

methodsThe databases were retrieved in an orderly manner from the dates of their establishment to October, 2018, including PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) of different anesthetic drugs combined with sevoflurane for ophthalmic surgery. Then a network meta-analysis was conducted using R and Stata 12.0 softwares.

resultsThe meta-analysis showed that, in reducing sevoflurane related EA, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol, fentanyl, midazolam, sufentanil, remifentanil and clonidine were superior to placebo (P < 0.05). The network meta-analysis showed that the effects of ancillary drugs combine with sevoflurane in reducing risk of EA in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery was superior to placebo: dexmedetomidine (OR = 0.17, 95% CrI 0.12-0.22), ketamine (OR = 0.30, 95% CrI 0.11-0.49), propofol (OR = 0.24, 95% CrI 0.09-0.63), fentanyl (OR = 0.16, 95% CrI 0.08-0.56), midazolam (OR = 0.20, 95% CrI 0.09-0.40), sufentanil (OR = 0.27, 95% CrI 0.14-0.41), remifentanil (OR = 0.18, 95% CrI 0.08-0.54) and clonidine (OR = 0.14, 95% CrI 0.07-0.41). The SUCRA of placebo, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol, fentanyl, midazolam, sufentanil, remifentanil, clonidine were respectively 0.26, 77.93, 27.71, 42.8, 69.43, 52.89, 59.83, 57.62 and 61.53%.

conclusionsThe effects of dexmedetomidine combine with sevoflurane in reducing risk of emergence agitation in children undergoing ophthalmic surgery was superior to other drugs.

Indexed as

Anesthesia Recovery PeriodAkathisia, Drug-InducedAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationBayes TheoremChildClonidineDexmedetomidineDrug Therapy, CombinationFentanylHumansKetamineMidazolamOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresPropofolPsychomotor AgitationAnalgesicsAnesthetics, InhalationClonidineDexmedetomidineFentanylKetamineMidazolamPropofolRemifentanilSevofluraneSufentanilAnesthetic drugsEmergence agitationNetwork meta-analysisOphthalmic surgeryRandomized control trial

Identifiers

PMID31370793
PMCPMC6670177
OpenAlexW2966315747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.