Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370789›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Outlook for coeliac disease patients: towards bread wheat with hypoimmunogenic gluten by gene editing of α- and γ-gliadin gene families.

Aurélie Jouanin, Jan G Schaart, Lesley A Boyd, James Cockram, Fiona J Leigh, Ruth Bates, Emma J Wallington, Richard G F Visser, Marinus J M Smulders

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Promoter DNA hypermethylation ofJournal of advanced research · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie JouaninWageningen University and Research, Plant Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands. aurelie.jouanin@gmail.com.
Jan G SchaartWageningen University and Research, Plant Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Lesley A BoydThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK.
James CockramThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK.
Fiona J LeighThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK.
Ruth BatesThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK.
Emma J WallingtonThe John Bingham Laboratory, NIAB, Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, UK.
Richard G F VisserWageningen University and Research, Plant Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marinus J M SmuldersWageningen University and Research, Plant Breeding, Wageningen, The Netherlands. rene.smulders@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8549-6046
National Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBWageningen University & Research · NLGraduate School Experimental Plant Sciences · NL

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions FP7-PEOPLE-2013_ITN-607178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheat grains contain gluten proteins, which harbour immunogenic epitopes that trigger Coeliac disease in 1-2% of the human population. Wheat varieties or accessions containing only safe gluten have not been identified and conventional breeding alone struggles to achieve such a goal, as the epitopes occur in gluten proteins encoded by five multigene families, these genes are partly located in tandem arrays, and bread wheat is allohexaploid. Gluten immunogenicity can be reduced by modification or deletion of epitopes. Mutagenesis technologies, including CRISPR/Cas9, provide a route to obtain bread wheat containing gluten proteins with fewer immunogenic epitopes.

resultsIn this study, we analysed the genetic diversity of over 600 α- and γ-gliadin gene sequences to design six sgRNA sequences on relatively conserved domains that we identified near coeliac disease epitopes. They were combined in four CRISPR/Cas9 constructs to target the α- or γ-gliadins, or both simultaneously, in the hexaploid bread wheat cultivar Fielder. We compared the results with those obtained with random mutagenesis in cultivar Paragon by γ-irradiation. For this, Acid-PAGE was used to identify T1 grains with altered gliadin protein profiles compared to the wild-type endosperm. We first optimised the interpretation of Acid-PAGE gels using Chinese Spring deletion lines. We then analysed the changes generated in 360 Paragon γ-irradiated lines and in 117 Fielder CRISPR/Cas9 lines. Similar gliadin profile alterations, with missing protein bands, could be observed in grains produced by both methods.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of using CRISPR/Cas9 to simultaneously edit multiple genes in the large α- and γ-gliadin gene families in polyploid bread wheat. Additional methods, generating genomics and proteomics data, will be necessary to determine the exact nature of the mutations generated with both methods.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelGene EditingGenes, PlantGliadinGlutensPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedSequence AlignmentTriticumCRISPR-Associated Protein 9GliadinGlutensCoeliac diseaseCRISPR/Cas9Gene editingGlutenMutation breedingPolyploidWheatα-Gliadinγ-Gliadinγ-Irradiation

Identifiers

PMID31370789
PMCPMC6670228
OpenAlexW2966328271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.