Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370760›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2019

Linear Accelerator-Based Radiotherapy Simulation Using On-Board Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for 3-Dimensional Volumetric Planning and Rapid Treatment in the Palliative Setting.

Brandon A Dyer, Chithra K Nair, Charles E Deardorff, Cari L Wright, Julian R Perks, Shyam S Rao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon A Dyer1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Chithra K Nair1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Charles E Deardorff1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Cari L Wright1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Julian R Perks1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Shyam S Rao1 Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California Davis Medical Center · USUC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliation of advanced disease using radiotherapy can create difficult clinical situations where standard computed tomography simulation and immobilization techniques are not feasible. We developed a linear accelerator-based radiotherapy simulation technique using nonstandard patient positioning for head and neck palliation using on-board kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography for 3-D volumetric planning and rapid treatment. Material and Methods: We proved cone-beam computed tomography simulation feasibility for semi-upright patient positioning using an anthropomorphic phantom on a clinical Elekta-Synergy linear accelerator. Cone-beam computed tomography imaging parameters were optimized for high-resolution image reconstruction and to ensure mechanical clearance. The patient was simulated using a cone-beam computed tomography-based approach and the cone-beam computed tomography digital imaging and communications in medicine file was imported to the treatment planning software to generate radiotherapy target volumes. Rapid planning was achieved by using a 3-level bulk density correction for air, soft tissue, and bone set at 0, 1.0, and 1.4 g/cm

resultsPatient volumetric imaging was obtained through cone-beam computed tomography simulation and treatment was delivered as planned without incident. Bulk density corrections were verified against conventionally simulated patients where differences were less than 1%. Conclusion: We successfully developed and employed a semi-upright kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography-based head and neck simulation and treatment planning method for 3-D conformal radiotherapy delivery. This approach provides 3-D documentation of the radiotherapy plan and allows tabulation of quantitative spatial dose information which is valuable if additional palliative treatments are needed in the future. This is a potentially valuable technique that has broad clinical applicability for benign and palliative treatments across multiple disease sites-particularly where standard supine simulation and immobilization techniques are not possible.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedParticle AcceleratorsPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageSoftwareTomography, X-Ray ComputedCBCTcone-beam computed tomographypalliative radiotherapyradiotherapy simulationsimulation techniques

Identifiers

PMID31370760
PMCPMC6676252
OpenAlexW2965352802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.