Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370645›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Yufan Du, Yi Shen, Xihong Wu, Jing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yufan DuDepartment of Machine Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yi ShenDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 200 South Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Xihong WuDepartment of Machine Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Machine Intelligence, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

Rapid Measurement of Routinely Estimated Psychophysical FunctionsR21DC013406 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI RICHARDS, VIRGINIA M, SHEN, YI · 2014 to 2015
$230k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC013406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech material influences the relative contributions of different frequency regions to intelligibility for English. In the current study, whether a similar effect of speech material is present for Mandarin Chinese was investigated. Speech recognition was measured using three speech materials in Mandarin, including disyllabic words, nonsense sentences, and meaningful sentences. These materials differed from one another in terms of the amount of contextual information and word frequency. The band importance function (BIF), as defined under the Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) framework, was used to quantify the contributions across frequency regions. The BIFs for the three speech materials were estimated from 16 adults who were native speakers of Mandarin. A Bayesian adaptive procedure was used to efficiently estimate the octave-frequency BIFs for the three materials for each listener. As the amount of contextual information increased, low-frequency bands (e.g., 250 and 500 Hz) became more important for speech recognition, consistent with English. The BIF was flatter for Mandarin than for comparable English speech materials. Introducing the language- and material-specific BIFs to the SII model led to improved predictions of Mandarin speech-recognition performance. Results suggested the necessity of developing material-specific BIFs for Mandarin.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAuditory PerceptionBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMaleNoiseSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID31370645
PMCPMC7273514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.