ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019
Vocal fold contact pressure in a three-dimensional body-cover phonation model.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of speaker adaptation to semi-occluded vocal tract exercises: Insights from computational phonation modeling.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Evaluating the accuracy of one-dimensional glottal flow model in predicting voice production: comparison to experiments and three-dimensional flow simulations.Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2025Article
- Biophysical aspects of mechanotransduction in cells and their physiological/biological implications in vocal fold vibration: a narrative review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Characterization of upper esophageal sphincter pressures relative to vocal acoustics.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025Article
- Interaction effects in laryngeal and respiratory control of the voice source and vocal fold contact pressure.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- What kind of phonation causes the strongest vocal fold collision? - A hemi-larynx phonation contact pressure study.Technisches Messen : TM · 2024Article
- The influence of sensor size on experimental measurement accuracy of vocal fold contact pressure.Proceedings of meetings on acoustics. Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- The influence of source-filter interaction on the voice source in a three-dimensional computational model of voice production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Oral vibratory sensations during voice production at different laryngeal and semi-occluded vocal tract configurations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Contribution of laryngeal size to differences between male and female voice production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Vocal tract adjustments to minimize vocal fold contact pressure during phonation.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Vocal fold dynamics in a synthetic self-oscillating model: Contact pressure and dissipated-energy dose.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Interaction between epilaryngeal and laryngeal adjustments in regulating vocal fold contact pressure.JASA express letters · 2021Article
- Laryngeal strategies to minimize vocal fold contact pressure and their effect on voice production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Toward Development of a Vocal Fold Contact Pressure Probe: Bench-Top Validation of a Dual-Sensor Probe Using Excised Human Larynx Models.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study is to identify vocal fold geometric and mechanical conditions that are likely to produce large contact pressure and thus high risk of vocal fold injury. Using a three-dimensional computational model of phonation, parametric simulations are performed with co-variations in vocal fold geometry and stiffness, with and without a vocal tract. For each simulation, the peak contact pressure is calculated. The results show that the subglottal pressure and the transverse stiffness of the vocal folds in the coronal plane have the largest and most consistent effect on the peak contact pressure, indicating the importance of maintaining a balance between the subglottal pressure and transverse stiffness to avoiding vocal fold injury. The presence of a vocal tract generally increases the peak contact pressure, particularly for an open-mouth vocal tract configuration. While a low degree of vocal fold approximation significantly reduces vocal fold contact pressure, for conditions of moderate and tight vocal fold approximation changes in vocal fold approximation may increase or decrease the peak contact pressure. The effects of the medial surface thickness and vocal fold stiffness along the anterior-posterior direction are similarly inconsistent and vary depending on other control parameters and the vocal tract configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.