Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370586›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

Using recurrent neural networks to improve the perception of speech in non-stationary noise by people with cochlear implants.

Tobias Goehring, Mahmoud Keshavarzi, Robert P Carlyon, Brian C J Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A CAUSAL DEEP LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR CLASSIFYING PHONEMES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTS.Proceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. ICASSP (Conference) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias GoehringMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
Mahmoud KeshavarziDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.
Robert P CarlyonMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, United Kingdom.
Brian C J MooreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech-in-noise perception is a major problem for users of cochlear implants (CIs), especially with non-stationary background noise. Noise-reduction algorithms have produced benefits but relied on a priori information about the target speaker and/or background noise. A recurrent neural network (RNN) algorithm was developed for enhancing speech in non-stationary noise and its benefits were evaluated for speech perception, using both objective measures and experiments with CI simulations and CI users. The RNN was trained using speech from many talkers mixed with multi-talker or traffic noise recordings. Its performance was evaluated using speech from an unseen talker mixed with different noise recordings of the same class, either babble or traffic noise. Objective measures indicated benefits of using a recurrent over a feed-forward architecture, and predicted better speech intelligibility with than without the processing. The experimental results showed significantly improved intelligibility of speech in babble noise but not in traffic noise. CI subjects rated the processed stimuli as significantly better in terms of speech distortions, noise intrusiveness, and overall quality than unprocessed stimuli for both babble and traffic noise. These results extend previous findings for CI users to mostly unseen acoustic conditions with non-stationary noise.

Identifiers

PMID31370586
PMCPMC6773603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.