Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369774›Full record

ReviewBehavioural brain research2019

Modes of division and differentiation of neural stem cells.

Alexander Lazutkin, Oleg Podgorny, Grigori Enikolopov

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cognitive Flexibility Is Selectively Impaired by Radiation and Is Associated with Differential Recruitment of Adult-Born Neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander LazutkinCenter for Developmental Genetics and Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia; P.K. Anokhin Institute for Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russia.
Oleg PodgornyCenter for Developmental Genetics and Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States; Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology, Moscow, Russia.
Grigori EnikolopovCenter for Developmental Genetics and Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States. Electronic address: grigori.enikolopov@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · USInstitute of Normal Physiology named after P.K. Anokhin · RU

Funding

Research Supplement for Kennelia MellansonRF1AG057705 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BENVENISTE, HELENE D, ENIKOLOPOV, GRIGORI N · 2017 to 2021
$3.7M
Neural stem cells in the aging brainR01AG040209 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ENIKOLOPOV, GRIGORI N · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
CRCNS: Computational Model for Neural Stem Cell Divisions in the Adult BrainR01MH092928 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ENIKOLOPOV, GRIGORI N, KOULAKOV, ALEXEI · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
Endogenous barcoding to reveal neural stem cell lineageR21AG063004 · NIA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI ENIKOLOPOV, GRIGORI N · 2019 to 2020
$439k
Alterations in Neuronal Networks induced by cART and HIVR21MH118991 · NIMH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI BUKRINSKY, MICHAEL ILYA, ENIKOLOPOV, GRIGORI N · 2019 to 2020
$430k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040209NIA NIH HHS R21 AG063004NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057705NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092928NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH118991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal neurogenesis presents an unorthodox form of neuronal plasticity and may be relevant for the normal or abnormal functioning of the human and animal brain. As production of new neurons decreases after birth, purposefully activating stem cells to create additional new neurons may augment brain function or slow a disease's progression. Here, we describe current models of hippocampal stem cell maintenance and differentiation, and emphasize key features of neural stem cells' turnover that may define hippocampal neurogenesis enhancement attempts' long-term consequences. We argue that even the basic blueprint of how stem cells are maintained, divide, differentiate, and are eliminated is still contentious, with different models potentially leading to vastly different outcomes in regard to neuronal production and stem cell pool preservation. We propose that to manipulate neurogenesis for a long-term benefit, we must first understand the outline of the neural stem cells' lifecycle.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCell DifferentiationCell DivisionHippocampusHumansModels, BiologicalNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuronsAadult hippocampal neurogenesisAgingModels of neurogenesisNeuroplasticityPreservation and productivity of the stem cell poolSelf-renewalStem cell quiescenceSymmetric and asymmetric divisions

Identifiers

PMID31369774
PMCPMC6892343
OpenAlexW2964520925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.