Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369671›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2019

Evaluation of Corneal Damage After Lacrimal Gland Excision in Male and Female Mice.

Neal E Mecum, Dan Cyr, Jennifer Malon, Danielle Demers, Ling Cao, Ian D Meng

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neal E MecumCenter for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
Dan CyrDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
Jennifer MalonCenter for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
Danielle DemersCenter for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
Ling CaoCenter for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
Ian D MengCenter for Excellence in the Neurosciences, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, United States.
University of New England · US

Funding

Tissue resident macrophages in sensory ganglia: function and impact on nociceptionP20GM103643 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI MENG, IAN D · 2012 to 2021
$20.9M
Role of the nerve regeneration-associated gene Sox11 in promoting corneal innervation and epithelial cell repair in dry eyeR01EY026145 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI MENG, IAN D · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026145NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Lacrimal gland excision (LGE) has been utilized in several studies to model aqueous tear deficiency, yet sex as a biological variable has not been factored in to these reports. This study compared corneal pathology in male and female mice following LGE-induced dry eye. Methods: An LGE of either the extraorbital lacrimal gland (single LGE) or both the extraorbital and intraorbital lacrimal glands (double LGE) was performed in male and female C57BL/6J and Balb/cJ mice to produce dry eye of graded severity. Following excision, tearing was evaluated with phenol red thread, and corneal fluorescein staining was scored to quantify the severity of damage. Corneas were evaluated for apoptosis by the TUNEL assay and for cell proliferation using Ki67 staining. Furthermore, corneas were harvested and analyzed for macrophages via flow cytometry. Results: Baseline tearing levels were similar in male and female mice, and LGE resulted in comparable reductions in tearing with the lowest levels recorded after double LGE. As determined by fluorescein staining, LGE produced more severe damage to the cornea in female C57BL/6J and Balb/cJ mice. Double LGE increased TUNEL and Ki67 staining in the cornea, with greater increases found in female mice. Furthermore, LGE produced a greater increase in the total number of corneal macrophages in female mice. Conclusions: These results indicate that female mice are more susceptible to LGE-induced corneal damage. The mechanisms involved in producing these sex differences still need to be elucidated but may involve increased inflammation and macrophage infiltration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCorneal DiseasesDry Eye SyndromesFemaleFlow CytometryFluoresceinFluorescent DyesInflammationIn Situ Nick-End LabelingKi-67 AntigenLacrimal ApparatusMacrophagesMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLFluoresceinFluorescent DyesKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID31369671
PMCPMC6675517
OpenAlexW2585741404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.