Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369581›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) Study: gender and risk of POAG in African Americans.

Naira Khachatryan, Maxwell Pistilli, Maureen G Maguire, Rebecca J Salowe, Raymond M Fertig, Tanisha Moore, Harini V Gudiseva, Venkata R M Chavali, David W Collins, Ebenezer Daniel and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naira KhachatryanScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Maxwell PistilliScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Maureen G MaguireScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Rebecca J SaloweScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Raymond M FertigScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Tanisha MooreScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Harini V GudisevaScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Venkata R M ChavaliScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
David W CollinsScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0043-0129
Ebenezer DanielScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Windell MurphyIndependent Physician, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Jeffrey D HendererDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Amanda LehmanScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Qi CuiScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Victoria AddisScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Prithvi S SankarScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Eydie G Miller-EllisScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Joan M O'BrienScheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center · USTemple University · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI William A. Beltran · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Primary Open Angle African-American Glaucoma Genetics Study RenewalR01EY023557 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI O'BRIEN, JOAN M · 2014 to 2025
$18.1M
PENN Vision Clinical Scientist ProgramK12EY015398 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOSHUA L DUNAIEF · 2004 to 2026
$11.7M
Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Dysfunction in Primary Open Angle GlaucomaK08EY029765 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CUI, QI N · 2019 to 2021
$731k
NEI NIH HHS HHSN263201200001CNEI NIH HHS K08 EY029765NEI NIH HHS K12 EY015398NEI NIH HHS L30 EY029353NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023557NIH HHS HHSN263201200001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between gender and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) among African Americans and to assess demographic, systemic, and behavioral factors that may contribute to differences between genders. The Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study had a case-control design and included African Americans 35 years and older, recruited from the greater Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Diagnosis of POAG was based on evidence of both glaucomatous optic nerve damage and characteristic visual field loss. Demographic and behavioral information, history of systemic diseases and anthropometric measurements were obtained at study enrollment. Gender differences in risk of POAG were examined using multivariate logistic regression. A total of 2,290 POAG cases and 2,538 controls were included in the study. The percentage of men among cases was higher than among controls (38.6% vs 30.3%, P<0.001). The subjects' mean age at enrollment was significantly higher for cases compared to controls (70.2±11.3 vs. 61.6±11.8 years, P<0.003). Cases had lower rates of diabetes (40% vs. 46%, P<0.001), higher rates of systemic hypertension (80% vs. 72%, P<0.001), and lower body mass index (BMI) (29.7±6.7 vs. 31.9±7.4, P<0.001) than controls. In the final multivariable model, male gender was significantly associated with POAG risk (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.44-1.87; P<0.001), after adjusting for age, systemic hypertension, diabetes, and BMI. Within the POAAGG study, men were at higher risk of having POAG than women. Pending genetic results from this study will be used to better understand the underlying genetic variations that may account for these differences.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanCase-Control StudiesFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaRisk FactorsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID31369581
PMCPMC6675103
OpenAlexW2965029812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.