ArticlePLoS genetics2019
Ddc2ATRIP promotes Mec1ATR activation at RPA-ssDNA tracts.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- SPHINX31 acts as a SRPK1 inhibitor targeting the ATR/DNA-PKcs/CHK1 replicative checkpoint to inhibit cell growth in non-small cell lung cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- The RPA-binding domain and the KKRK motif in Rad26ATRIP cooperate at the perturbed DNA replication fork for initiating checkpoint signalling.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Yeast Nat4 regulates DNA damage checkpoint signaling through its N-terminal acetyltransferase activity on histone H4.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Replication protein-A, RPA, plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of recombination checkpoint in yeast meiosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novel Cellular Functions of ATR for Therapeutic Targeting: Embryogenesis to Tumorigenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The translocated virulence protein VirD5 causes DNA damage and mutation duringScience advances · 2022Article
- Review
- Recruitment of Scc2/4 to double-strand breaks depends on γH2A and DNA end resection.Life science alliance · 2022Article
- The DNA damage checkpoint: A tale from budding yeast.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- A basal-level activity of ATR links replication fork surveillance and stress response.Molecular cell · 2021Article
- Novel insights into the mechanism of cell cycle kinases Mec1(ATR) and Tel1(ATM).Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2021Article
- Activation of ATR-related protein kinase upon DNA damage recognition.Current genetics · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The DNA damage checkpoint response is controlled by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK), including ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ATM and Rad3-related (ATR). ATR forms a complex with its partner ATRIP. In budding yeast, ATR and ATRIP correspond to Mec1 and Ddc2, respectively. ATRIP/Ddc2 interacts with replication protein A-bound single-stranded DNA (RPA-ssDNA) and recruits ATR/Mec1 to sites of DNA damage. Mec1 is stimulated by the canonical activators including Ddc1, Dpb11 and Dna2. We have characterized the ddc2-S4 mutation and shown that Ddc2 not only recruits Mec1 to sites of DNA damage but also stimulates Mec1 kinase activity. However, the underlying mechanism of Ddc2-dependent Mec1 activation remains to be elucidated. Here we show that Ddc2 promotes Mec1 activation independently of Ddc1/Dpb11/Dna2 function in vivo and through ssDNA recognition in vitro. The ddc2-S4 mutation diminishes damage-induced phosphorylation of the checkpoint mediators, Rad9 and Mrc1. Rad9 controls checkpoint throughout the cell-cycle whereas Mrc1 is specifically required for the S-phase checkpoint. Notably, S-phase checkpoint signaling is more defective in ddc2-S4 mutants than in cells where the Mec1 activators (Ddc1/Dpb11 and Dna2) are dysfunctional. To understand a role of Ddc2 in Mec1 activation, we reconstituted an in vitro assay using purified Mec1-Ddc2 complex, RPA and ssDNA. Whereas ssDNA stimulates kinase activity of the Mec1-Ddc2 complex, RPA does not. However, RPA can promote ssDNA-dependent Mec1 activation. Neither ssDNA nor RPA-ssDNA efficiently stimulates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex containing Ddc2-S4 mutant. Together, our data support a model in which Ddc2 promotes Mec1 activation at RPA-ssDNA tracts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.