SynthesisCritical care medicine2019
Antibiotic- and Fluid-Focused Bundles Potentially Improve Sepsis Management, but High-Quality Evidence Is Lacking for the Specificity Required in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's Sepsis Bundle (SEP-1).
Synthesis in Critical care medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) Compliance and Implementation on Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis : A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2025Pooled it
- [Early source control of infection in patients seen in the emergency department: a systematic review].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024Pooled it
- Presenting Symptoms and Antibiotic Timing Among Hospitalized Adults With Presumed Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Decreased racial disparities in sepsis mortality after an order set-driven initiative: An analysis of 8151 patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the Extent and Depth of Clinical Education on Sepsis SEP-1 Core Measure and the Reported Impact on Outcomes and Compliance rate: A Scoping Review.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
- Be-SNAP: the Belgian Sepsis National Action Plan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Mortality Prediction in Septic Patients Using Routine Post-Diagnosis Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Article
- Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?Microorganisms · 2023Review
- How to improve the care of septic patients following "Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021"?Journal of intensive medicine · 2023Article
- Resuscitation in the First 3 Hours of Sepsis-Induced Hypotension Varies by Patient and Hospital Factors.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of automated alerting system compared to usual care for the management of sepsis.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Infectious Diseases Society of America Position Paper: Recommended Revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) Sepsis Quality Measure.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- Article
- Individualized Care Is Superior to Standardized Care for the Majority of Critically Ill Patients.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- Association of a Care Bundle for Early Sepsis Management With Mortality Among Patients With Hospital-Onset or Community-Onset Sepsis.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Article
- Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Fluid resuscitation of at least 30 mL/kg was not associated with decreased mortality in patients with infection, signs of hypoperfusion, and a do-not-intubate order.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
- What's New in Critical Illness and Injury Science? Antibiotics in critical care: Therapeutic toolbox.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo address three controversial components in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's sepsis bundle for performance measure (SEP-1): antibiotics within 3 hours, a 30 mL/kg fluid infusion for all hypotensive patients, and repeat lactate measurements within 6 hours if initially elevated. We hypothesized that antibiotic- and fluid-focused bundles like SEP-1 would probably show benefit, but evidence supporting specific antibiotic timing, fluid dosing, or serial lactate requirements would not be concordant. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of studies of sepsis bundles like SEP-1. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov through March 15, 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Studies comparing survival in septic adults receiving versus not receiving antibiotic- and fluid-focused bundles. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators (D.J.P., P.Q.E.). DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventeen observational studies (11,303 controls and 4,977 bundle subjects) met inclusion criteria. Bundles were associated with increased odds ratios of survival (odds ratio [95% CI]) in 15 studies with substantial heterogeneity (I = 61%; p < 0.01). Survival benefits were consistent in the five largest (1,697-12,486 patients per study) (1.20 [1.11-1.30]; I = 0%) and six medium-sized studies (167-1,029) (2.03 [1.52-2.71]; I = 8%) but not the six smallest (64-137) (1.25 [0.42-3.66]; I = 57%). Bundles were associated with similarly increased survival benefits whether requiring antibiotics within 1 hour (n = 7 studies) versus 3 hours (n = 8) versus no specified time (n = 2); or 30 mL/kg fluid (n = 7) versus another volume (≥ 2 L, n = 1; ≥ 20 mL/kg, n = 2; 1.5-2 L or 500 mL, n = 1 each; none specified, n = 4) (p = 0.19 for each comparison). In the only study employing serial lactate measurements, survival was not increased versus others. No study had a low risk of bias or assessed potential adverse bundle effects.
conclusionsAvailable studies support the notion that antibiotic- and fluid-focused sepsis bundles like SEP-1 improve survival but do not demonstrate the superiority of any specific antibiotic time or fluid volume or of serial lactate measurements. Until strong reproducible evidence demonstrates the safety and benefit of any fixed requirement for these interventions, the present findings support the revision of SEP-1 to allow flexibility in treatment according to physician judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.