Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369335›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2019

A model-based analysis of autonomic nervous function in response to the Valsalva maneuver.

E Benjamin Randall, Anna Billeschou, Louise S Brinth, Jesper Mehlsen, Mette S Olufsen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07019519 (Interplay Between Gut Hormones and Autonomic Postprandial Blood Flow Regulation in Patients With POTS), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07019519 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Interplay Between Gut Hormones and Autonomic Postprandial Blood Flow Regulation in Patients With POTS

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CopenhagenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsPostural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), HealthyArmsSaline/Placebo, GIPR antagonist, GLP-1R antagonist, CCK agonist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Classification of orthostatic intolerance through data analytics.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E Benjamin RandallDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Anna BilleschouDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Louise S BrinthDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Jesper MehlsenSection of Surgical Pathophysiology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mette S OlufsenDepartment of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Funding

The Virtual Physiological Rat ProjectP50GM094503 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BEARD, DANIEL A · 2011 to 2015
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM094503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is a diagnostic protocol examining sympathetic and parasympathetic activity in patients with autonomic dysfunction (AD) impacting cardiovascular control. Because direct measurement of these signals is costly and invasive, AD is typically assessed indirectly by analyzing heart rate and blood pressure response patterns. This study introduces a mathematical model that can predict sympathetic and parasympathetic dynamics. Our model-based analysis includes two control mechanisms: respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreceptor reflex (baroreflex). The RSA submodel integrates an electrocardiogram-derived respiratory signal with intrathoracic pressure, and the baroreflex submodel differentiates aortic and carotid baroreceptor regions. Patient-specific afferent and efferent signals are determined for 34 control subjects and 5 AD patients, estimating parameters fitting the model output to heart rate data. Results show that inclusion of RSA and distinguishing aortic/carotid regions are necessary to model the heart rate response to the VM. Comparing control subjects to patients shows that RSA and baroreflex responses are significantly diminished. This study compares estimated parameter values from the model-based predictions to indices used in clinical practice. Three indices are computed to determine adrenergic function from the slope of the systolic blood pressure in phase II [

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutonomic Nervous SystemBaroreflexBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleRespiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaValsalva ManeuverYoung Adultbaroreflex mechanismcarotid and aortic baroreceptorsmathematical modelingparameter estimationsympathetic and parasympathetic activity

Identifiers

PMID31369335
PMCPMC6879835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.