Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369155›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2019

Unitization modulates recognition of within-domain and cross-domain associations: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Bingcan Li, Meng Han, Chunyan Guo, Roni Tibon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bingcan LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Meng HanBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Chunyan GuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
Roni TibonMRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1252-6715

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is often assumed that memory of episodic associations requires recollection, it has been suggested that, when stimuli are experienced as a unit, earlier memory processes might contribute to their subsequent associative recognition. We investigated the effects of associative relations and perceptual domain during episodic encoding on the ability to utilize early memory processes to retrieve associative information. During the study phase, participants encoded compound and noncompound words pairs, presented either to the same sensory modality (visual presentation) or to different sensory modalities (audiovisual presentation). At the test phase, they discriminated between old, rearranged, and new pairs while ERPs were recorded. In an early ERP component, differences related to associative memory emerged only for compounds, regardless of their encoding modality. These findings indicate that episodic retrieval of compound words can be supported by early-onset recognition processes regardless of whether both words were presented to the same or different sensory modalities, and suggests that unitization can operate at an abstract level, across a broad range of materials.

Indexed as

AssociationMemory, EpisodicAdultCerebral CortexElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionYoung Adultepisodic memoryfamiliarityrecognitionrecollectionunitization

Identifiers

PMID31369155
PMCPMC6852485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.