ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2020
Factorial Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants to assess interactions.
Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mendelian Randomization Reveals Interleukin-6 Receptor-Lipoprotein(a) Interplay With Independent Cardiovascular Risk Reductions.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2026Article
- Type 2 Diabetes Causally Reduces Circulating Vitamin D Levels: A Multi-Ancestry Mendelian Randomization Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Integrating genetic data with biological insight: A practical guide to cis-Mendelian randomization.American journal of human genetics · 2026Review
- Human Genetics Informing Drug Development in Cardiovascular Disease: Interleukin-6 Signaling as a Case Study.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Review
- Are associations of adulthood overweight and obesity with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and obesity-related cancer modified by comparative body weight at age 10 years in the UK Biobank study?International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Cardiometabolic Efficacy and Safety of Lipoprotein Lipase Pathway Targets in Combination With Approved Lipid-Lowering Targets: A Drug Target Mendelian Randomization Study.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring Interaction between Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels on the Odds for Psoriasis in UK Biobank and the HUNT Study: A Factorial Mendelian Randomization Study.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025Article
- The impact of sleep on breast cancer-specific mortality: a Mendelian randomisation study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Causal relationship between circulating immune cells and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Assessment of the bidirectional causal association between Helicobacter pylori infection and allergic diseases by mendelian randomization analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Factorial Mendelian randomization of lipoprotein (a) lowering, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering, and lifestyle improvements: joint associations with cardiovascular risk.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- A Review of Mendelian Randomization: Assumptions, Methods, and Application to Obesity-Related Diseases.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Two-Sample Network Mendelian Randomization and Single-Cell Analysis Reveal the Causal Associations and Underlying Mechanisms Between Antihypertensive Drugs and Kidney Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Drug-target Mendelian randomisation applied to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: opportunities and challenges.eGastroenterology · 2024Review
- Smoking and alcohol by HPV status in head and neck cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Potential association of rheumatic diseases with bone mineral density and fractures: a bi-directional mendelian randomization study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Optimising the use of electronic medical records for large scale research in psychiatry.Translational psychiatry · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Genetic causal role of body mass index in multiple neurological diseases.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFactorial Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants to answer questions about interactions. Although the approach has been used in applied investigations, little methodological advice is available on how to design or perform a factorial Mendelian randomization analysis. Previous analyses have employed a 2 × 2 approach, using dichotomized genetic scores to divide the population into four subgroups as in a factorial randomized trial.
methodsWe describe two distinct contexts for factorial Mendelian randomization: investigating interactions between risk factors, and investigating interactions between pharmacological interventions on risk factors. We propose two-stage least squares methods using all available genetic variants and their interactions as instrumental variables, and using continuous genetic scores as instrumental variables rather than dichotomized scores. We illustrate our methods using data from UK Biobank to investigate the interaction between body mass index and alcohol consumption on systolic blood pressure.
resultsSimulated and real data show that efficiency is maximized using the full set of interactions between genetic variants as instruments. In the applied example, between 4- and 10-fold improvement in efficiency is demonstrated over the 2 × 2 approach. Analyses using continuous genetic scores are more efficient than those using dichotomized scores. Efficiency is improved by finding genetic variants that divide the population at a natural break in the distribution of the risk factor, or else divide the population into more equal-sized groups.
conclusionsPrevious factorial Mendelian randomization analyses may have been underpowered. Efficiency can be improved by using all genetic variants and their interactions as instrumental variables, rather than the 2 × 2 approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.